Review
Obstetrics
Maternal infection and risk of preeclampsia: Systematic review and metaanalysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.040Get rights and content

There are lingering questions regarding the association between maternal infection and preeclampsia. Systematic review and metaanalysis was conducted of observational studies that examined the relationship between maternal infection and preeclampsia. Forty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The risk of preeclampsia was increased in pregnant women with urinary tract infection (pooled odds ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.45-1.70) and periodontal disease (pooled odds ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.43-2.18). There were no associations between preeclampsia and presence of antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori, and cytomegalovirus, treated and nontreated HIV infection, and malaria. Individual studies did not find a relationship between herpes simplex virus type 2, bacterial vaginosis, and Mycoplasma hominis and preeclampsia. Urinary tract infection and periodontal disease during pregnancy are associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. More studies are required to verify this as well as to explore whether or not such relationships are causal and, if so, the mechanisms involved.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

The systematic review was conducted following a prospectively prepared protocol and reported using the Metaanalysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines for metaanalysis of observational studies.9

An initial search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE, CINAHL, and LILACS (all from inception to June 30, 2007) to identify potentially eligible studies. We applied the following algorithm both in MeSH and in free-text words: (infection OR inflammation) AND (preeclampsia OR

Results

The searches produced 1816 citations of which 88 were considered relevant (77 through computer search, and 11 from references cited in articles). Thirty-nine studies were excluded, mainly because they lacked data relating maternal infection and preeclampsia (79%) or included women without proteinuria in the preeclampsia group (13%). References for excluded studies can be obtained from the authors. Forty-nine studies (27 case-control, 19 cohort, and 3 cross-sectional)16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22,

Comment

Our study, using the most rigorous methodology for performing systematic reviews of observational studies, demonstrates that both urinary tract infection and periodontal disease during pregnancy are associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. Moreover, there is some evidence suggesting that treating urinary tract infections during pregnancy reduces the incidence of preeclampsia. These data support the hypothesis that infection may play a causal role in the development of preeclampsia or

References (80)

  • E. Teran et al.

    Seroprevalence of antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae in women with preeclampsia

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2003)
  • P. von Dadelszen et al.

    Levels of antibodies against cytomegalovirus and Chlamydophila pneumoniae are increased in early onset pre-eclampsia

    BJOG

    (2003)
  • M. Aral et al.

    Chlamydia pneumoniae seropositivity in women with pre-eclampsia

    Int J Gynaecol Obstet

    (2006)
  • F. Arechavaleta-Velasco et al.

    Adeno-associated virus-2 (AAV-2) causes trophoblast dysfunction, and placental AAV-2 infection is associated with preeclampsia

    Am J Pathol

    (2006)
  • R.C. Wimalasundera et al.

    Pre-eclampsia, antiretroviral therapy, and immune reconstitution

    Lancet

    (2002)
  • M.R. de Groot et al.

    HIV infection in critically ill obstetrical patients

    Int J Gynaecol Obstet

    (2003)
  • R. Mattar et al.

    Preeclampsia and HIV infection

    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

    (2004)
  • H. Sartelet et al.

    Malaria associated pre-eclampsia in Senegal

    Lancet

    (1996)
  • T. Kurki et al.

    Depression and anxiety in early pregnancy and risk for preeclampsia

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2000)
  • H.L. Lamarca et al.

    Human cytomegalovirus-induced inhibition of cytotrophoblast invasion in a first trimester extravillous cytotrophoblast cell line

    Placenta

    (2006)
  • F. De Wolf et al.

    The ultrastructure of acute atherosis in hypertensive pregnancy

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1975)
  • J. Danesh et al.

    Chronic infections and coronary heart disease: is there a link?

    Lancet

    (1997)
  • M.M. Faas et al.

    A new animal model for human preeclampsia: ultra-low-dose endotoxin infusion in pregnant rats

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1994)
  • P.E. Gower et al.

    Follow-up of 164 patients with bacteriuria of pregnancy

    Lancet

    (1968)
  • A. Conde-Agudelo et al.

    Risk factors for preeclampsia in a large cohort of Latin American and Caribbean women

    BJOG

    (2000)
  • J.M. Roberts et al.

    Summary of the NHLBI working group on research on hypertension during pregnancy

    Hypertension

    (2003)
  • C. Lam et al.

    Circulating angiogenic factors in the pathogenesis and prediction of preeclampsia

    Hypertension

    (2005)
  • C.W. Redman et al.

    Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia

    Science

    (2005)
  • P. von Dadelszen et al.

    Could an infectious trigger explain the differential maternal response to the shared placental pathology of preeclampsia and normotensive intrauterine growth restriction?

    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand

    (2002)
  • M. Levine et al.

    Users’ guides to the medical literature. IVHow to use an article about harm. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group

    JAMA

    (1994)
  • D.F. Stroup et al.

    Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reportingMeta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • A.B. Hill

    The environment and disease: association or causation?

    Proc R Soc Med

    (1965)
  • D.L. Weed et al.

    Biologic plausibility in causal inference: current method and practice

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1998)
  • S.H. Downs et al.

    The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (1998)
  • S.D. Walter et al.

    A comparison of several point estimators of the odds ratio in a single 2 x 2 contingency table

    Biometrics

    (1991)
  • J.P. Higgins et al.

    Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

    BMJ

    (2003)
  • M. Egger et al.

    Bias in meta-analyses detected by a simple graphical test

    BMJ

    (1997)
  • R.E. Bryant et al.

    Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy and its association with prematurity

    J Lab Clin Med

    (1964)
  • K.L. Stuart et al.

    Bacteriuria, prematurity, and the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

    BMJ

    (1965)
  • W. Brumfitt

    The effects of bacteriuria in pregnancy on maternal and fetal health

    Kidney Int

    (1975)
  • Cited by (242)

    • The differential expression of toll like receptors and RIG-1 in the placenta of neonates with in utero infections

      2023, Annals of Diagnostic Pathology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In preeclampsia, the pattern would be increased TLR2, TLR3, TLR4 as well as TLR8 (the latter for early-onset disease only) and reduced RIG-1. The importance of this distinction is highlighted by studies that have indicated that maternal infection, especially in the urinary tract, that does not involve the neonate can be associated with preeclampsia [40]. Finally, the study strongly suggests that the diagnostic pathologist must rely on molecular and not histologic findings to diagnose most cases of in utero infection; some viruses such as CMV can produce specific inclusions but these are rare.

    • Hypertension and pregnancy: review of the literature

      2023, Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes
    • The etiology of preeclampsia

      2022, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Reprints not available from the authors.

    This study was supported by the United Nations Development Programme/United Nations Population Fund/World Health Organization/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    The views expressed in this document are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the World Health Organization or its Member States.

    View full text