Elsevier

Contraception

Volume 75, Issue 3, March 2007, Pages 168-170
Contraception

Commentary
The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2006.11.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the many contraceptive options available in the United States, nearly half (49%) of the 6.4 million pregnancies each year are unintended; these represent a significant cost to the health care system.

Methods

The total number of unintended pregnancies and their outcomes were obtained from the literature. Direct medical costs were estimated for each unintended pregnancy outcome.

Results

The direct medical costs of unintended pregnancies were US$5 billion in 2002. Direct medical cost savings due to contraceptive use were US$19 billion.

Discussion

Unintended pregnancies are a costly problem in the United States. Contraceptive use can reduce direct and indirect costs; hence, payers may realize cost savings by providing coverage of contraceptive products.

Introduction

Despite the many contraceptive options available in the United States, nearly half (49%) of the 6.4 million pregnancies each year are unintended, which means that at the time that the pregnancy occurred, the woman either did not want to have children anymore (unwanted pregnancy) or wanted additional children but at a later time (mistimed pregnancy) [1]. These unintended pregnancies result in significant costs regardless of the outcome that the woman chooses for her pregnancy.

Previous studies have evaluated the costs of contraception, including the cost of unintended pregnancies associated with contraceptive failures, and the cost-effectiveness of contraceptive methods [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. However, there are currently no studies that examine the total economic health care burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States. We fill that gap by estimating the direct medical cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States in 2002. We also estimate the savings in unintended pregnancy costs attributable to contraceptive use.

Section snippets

Methods

We obtained the number of unintended pregnancies from the literature. The number of unintended births was obtained from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG); the number of induced abortions was obtained from a 2000 survey of abortion providers by the Guttmacher Institute; the number of fetal losses resulting from unintended pregnancies was estimated as the product of the ratio of fetal losses to births in the 2002 NSFG, the total number of births and the fraction of fetal losses

Results

Direct medical costs of unintended pregnancy are shown in Table 1. The total, US$5.0 billion, comprises US$3.924 billion for births, US$797 million for induced abortions and US$266 million for fetal losses. The average cost of an unintended pregnancy is US$1609.

The total annual number of pregnancies averted by contraceptive use is shown in Table 2. Since each pregnancy averted is associated with an average of US$1609 in direct medical expenditures, the total of 12.0 million pregnancies averted

Discussion

As shown in our analysis, unintended pregnancies are clearly a costly problem in the United States. Direct medical costs of unintended pregnancies are high (US$5 billion). This cost is likely to be understated because we assumed that the medical care cost of an unintended birth is no greater than the average cost of all births. A report from the Institute of Medicine concludes:

With an unwanted pregnancy especially, the mother is more likely to seek prenatal care after the first trimester or not

References (19)

  • C.F. Chiou et al.

    Economic analysis of contraceptives for women

    Contraception

    (2003)
  • J. Trussell

    Contraceptive failure in the United States

    Contraception

    (2004)
  • J. Trussell et al.

    Cost savings from emergency contraceptive pills in Canada

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2001)
  • L.B. Finer et al.

    Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001

    Perspect Sex Reprod Health

    (2006)
  • B.G. Ortmeier et al.

    A cost–benefit analysis of four hormonal contraceptive methods

    Clin Ther

    (1994)
  • C.J. Phillips

    Economic analysis of long-term reversible contraceptives. Focus on Implanon

    Pharmacoeconomics

    (2000)
  • Trussell J, Koenig J, Stewart F, Darroch JE. Medical care cost savings from adolescent contraceptive use. Fam Plann...
  • J. Trussell et al.

    The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

    Am J Public Health

    (1995)
  • A. Chandra et al.

    Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth

    Vital Health Stat 23

    (1997)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (145)

  • Emergency contraception and impact on abortion rates

    2020, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
View all citing articles on Scopus

This research was partially supported by grants from Berlex, Inc., and Organon, Inc. The content of this article was not influenced by these companies, nor does it reflect in any way the companies' views or positions.

View full text