Treatment of Stress Fractures: The Fundamentals

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2005.08.013Get rights and content

Section snippets

Treatment principles

When considering treatment plans for a stress injury, one must understand why the injury occurs in the first place. Stress injuries occur when a physiologic load is placed on a bone in a repetitive fashion at a rate at which the body does not have time to recover. The load is considered insufficient to cause acute injury but, when combined with a cyclic pattern, can result in chronic injury. It is the “right” (or better stated, “wrong”) combination of load, repetition, and inadequate recovery

Training Regimen

An increase in activity is often the triggering event for a stress injury. Numerous military studies have shown the high rate of stress injury during basic training for which a progressive and demanding exercise regimen is required [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. These military studies provide a relatively uniform patient population that, by order of the commanding officer, is highly compliant. When an increase in activity is noted in the patient's history, activity modification is

Anatomic Variation

Variations in anatomy have been implicated as a cause for lower-extremity stress fractures. An example of this is Morton's foot with a short, hypermobile first ray and a long second ray. In a study of second metatarsal fractures in ballet dancers by Khan and colleagues [31], six of the eight case reports were noted to have Morton's foot. Giladi and coworkers [32] reported the higher incidence of tibial stress fractures in male recruits who had greater passive external rotation of the hip

Ultrasound

A number of studies have shown that ultrasound is effective in reducing the healing time of acute fractures. In a prospective double-blind randomized study of 67 tibial shaft fractures, Heckman and colleagues [38] reported a significant decrease in healing time with the addition of ultrasound (86 ± 5.8 days versus 114 ± 10.4 days). Kristiansen and coworkers [39], in a prospective double-blind study of distal radius fractures, also noted a significant decrease in healing time (61 ± 3 days versus

High-risk stress fractures

Any treatment plan for stress fractures must also take into consideration the inherent and specific risk for further injury. It is helpful when devising a treatment plan to understand the difference between the “safe” and “high-risk” stress injury. A stress fracture may be considered higher risk if it has a high propensity to progress to a complete fracture. In addition, the morbidity associated with the completed or possibly displaced fracture must also be considered. Essentially, the higher

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (47)

  • G.W. Nuber et al.

    Olecranon stress fractures in throwers: a report of two cases and a review of the literature

    Clin Orthop

    (1992)
  • L. Adolfsson et al.

    Case report: clavicular stress fracture in a javelin thrower

    Clin Sports Med

    (1990)
  • A.C. Rettig

    Stress fracture in the humerus in an adolescent tennis tournament player

    Am J Sports Med

    (1985)
  • A.R. Loosli et al.

    Stress fractures of the distal radius: a case report

    Am J Sports Med

    (1991)
  • R.H. Bell et al.

    Stress fracture of the distal ulna: a case report

    Clin Orthop

    (1986)
  • S.R. Bollen et al.

    Stress fractures of the ulna in tennis players using a double-handed backhand stroke

    Am J Sports Med

    (1993)
  • A. Berstein et al.

    March fractures of the foot: care and management of 692 patients

    Am J Surg

    (1946)
  • A. Berstein et al.

    March fracture: a report of 307 cases and a new method of treatment

    J Bone Joint Surg [Am]

    (1944)
  • R.B. Freaney et al.

    Distribution and natural history of stress fractures in US Marine recruits

    Radiology

    (1983)
  • M. Giladi et al.

    Unusual distribution and onset of stress fractures in soldiers

    Clin Orthop Rel Res

    (1985)
  • R.E. Kreipe et al.

    March fracture: an analysis of two hundred cases

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (1944)
  • A.L. Leveton

    March fractures of the long bones of the lower extremities and pelvis

    Am J Surg

    (1936)
  • T.J. Scully et al.

    Stress fractures: a preventable training injury

    Mil Med

    (1982)
  • Cited by (42)

    • Stress Fractures of the Hip and Pelvis

      2021, Clinics in Sports Medicine
    • Stress fractures: Definition, diagnosis and treatment

      2016, Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
    • Current concepts of shockwave therapy in stress fractures

      2015, International Journal of Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, in early stages it is the most specific and sensitive test available, as radiographic findings only appear after three weeks of the initial microfracture [27,79]. Treatment of stress fractures is based on a mechanical and a biological approach [72]. Load control on the mechanical side is the basic treatment, in order to allow the biological bone turnover to recover the stressed area.

    • Anterior knee pain in the athlete

      2014, Clinics in Sports Medicine
    • Bilateral stress fracture of the tibia diagnosed by ultrasound. A case report

      2012, Journal of Ultrasound
      Citation Excerpt :

      Computed tomography (CT) scan can show FF, but due to utilisation of radiation it is less favoured than the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI is the examination of choice in the early detection of SF but its use is limited by lack of access and associated cost [3]. In the past few years, various authors have reported ultrasound (US) as an inexpensive, non-invasive and ready modality with high sensitivity for the investigation of SF of the metatarsal [10,11].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text