Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 52, Issue 1, July 2007, Pages 230-238
European Urology

Voiding Dysfunction
Design and Validation of a New Screening Instrument for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: The Bladder Control Self-Assessment Questionnaire (B-SAQ)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

To develop and validate a short patient self-assessment screening questionnaire: bladder control self-assessment questionnaire (B-SAQ) for the evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms. This first validation study was undertaken amongst women.

Patients and methods

Three hundred twenty-nine women attending general gynaecology and urogynaecology clinics completed both the B-SAQ and Kings Health questionnaire prior to medical consultation, and independent physician assessment of the presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and need for treatment. The psychometric properties of the B-SAQ were subsequently analysed.

Results

The B-SAQ was quick and easy to complete, with 89% of respondents completing all items correctly in less than 5 min. The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha score 0.90–0.91), criterion validity (Pearson’s correlation values of 0.79 and 0.81, p < 0.0001 with the incontinence impact domain of the Kings Health questionnaire), and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire were good. The sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire to identify patients with bothersome LUTS was 98% and 79%, respectively.

Conclusions

LUTS are commonly underreported. Empowering patients to self-assess their bladder symptoms and the need for treatment will improve treatment-seeking behaviour. The B-SAQ is a psychometrically robust, short screening questionnaire that offers patients the ability to assess their bladder symptoms and the bother they cause, and the potential benefit of seeking medical help.

Introduction

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are distressing and debilitating, and have a significant impact on an individual’s health and quality of life. The associated stigma of bladder problems, a false belief that they are an inevitable consequence of ageing and childbirth, embarrassment, and uncertainty regarding the availability of treatment can prevent people from seeking help [1].

Patients develop elaborate strategies and altered lifestyles to cope with their symptoms. A European study (SIFO) [2] investigating the prevalence of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms found that only 60% of people with symptoms had ever consulted a doctor, although a higher proportion of patients reported that their symptoms had an effect on daily living. A similar prevalence of OAB was found in the American (NOBLE) OAB study [3].

It has been estimated that people suffering with LUTS will wait an average of 4 years before seeking help [4]. Women are less likely to seek help than men for bothersome LUTS. Awareness of prostatic problems amongst male patients may prompt them to seek reassurance that there is no serious underlying pathology [5].

The challenge for health care providers is to educate and empower patients about their bladder symptoms, to allow them to differentiate what is normal from abnormal, and to determine when to seek medical help. We also need to help busy clinicians to identify patients who have bladder symptoms and may benefit from medical intervention. Often in clinic consultations, time is at a premium, and bladder symptoms may not be discussed. Screening instruments aim to identify undetected or unreported disease in the community and increase public awareness of a health condition.

The financial costs of LUTS, both direct and indirect, are already significant and likely to increase as the population ages [6]. Identification of patients with early or less troublesome urinary symptoms may help us to intervene earlier and perhaps improve overall treatment efficacy. Early intervention with simple measures such as lifestyle advice and behavioural therapy may reduce the need for initiating more complex and costly treatment in a proportion of patients. Earlier detection and treatment of LUTS may reduce complications such as skin ulceration, urinary tract infection, and falls and fractures, particularly in the elderly population [7].

The aim of this study was to design and validate a self-administered screening questionnaire that is simple to understand, complete, and interpret: the bladder control self-assessment questionnaire (B-SAQ). A questionnaire to assess symptoms and associated bother, and to guide the patient, if necessary, to seek treatment is not available elsewhere. A self-assessment questionnaire would contribute to raising awareness of bladder problems within society and prompt people to seek earlier intervention. Hopefully this will result in earlier referral, treatment, and improvement in quality of life.

Section snippets

Instrument development

The B-SAQ questionnaire was developed by a European panel of experts in lower urinary tract dysfunction, who used a standardised multistep method. The aim was to develop a concise questionnaire that would identify the presence and bother of symptoms, and guide treatment-seeking behaviour.

Item selection and reduction

The initial pool of questions was generated following literature review and expert panel opinion. Three pilot versions of the questionnaire were tested. The initial version was significantly longer than the

Results

Three hundred and twenty-nine women of different ethnic origin took part in the study (Table 1). The mean age of the participating women was 47 years (range: 18–83). Two hundred and ninety-three (89%) women correctly completed and returned the B-SAQ; 226 (77%) women correctly and fully completed the KHQ. Clinical diagnosis from the doctor’s evaluation sheet defined 102 (31%) participants as asymptomatic controls.

Discussion

Our findings support the view that the B-SAQ is a psychometrically robust instrument with good reliability and validity, and is ideal for opportunistic screening for LUTS amongst women. Studies are ongoing to validate the B-SAQ amongst men. The high internal consistency of the B-SAQ reflects good correlation between questionnaire items, which together form a reliable measure of the presence and burden of LUTS. Test-retest analysis shows repeat scores to be highly correlated and in good

Conclusions

This study confirms that the B-SAQ questionnaire is a valid screening tool for the presence and bother of LUTS in women. The design and format of the questionnaire is concise and comprehensible, with easily interpretable scores. It provides a reliable means of rapid assessment of LUTS, particularly overactive bladder and urinary incontinence, within a health service where delivery of care is restricted by time constraints and an ever-increasing workload. Validation of the B-SAQ with male

Conflicts of interest

R. Basra and E. Cortes have no conflicts of interest and no affiliations.

The followings authors are members of the European Overactive Bladder Forum sponsored by Astellas. The data was collected and analysed independently by the authors.

Kelleher C, Artibani W, Cardozo L, Castro-Diaz D, Chapple C, De Ridder D, Espuna Pons M, Haab F, Hohenfellner M, Kirby M, Milsom I, Van Kerrebroeck P, Vierhout M, Wagg A.

This work was sponsored by Astellas.

References (16)

  • J.M. Bland et al.

    Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha

    BMJ

    (1997)
  • Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, et al. Incontinence, vol 1. Basics and evaluation. 3rd International Consultation on...
  • I. Milsom et al.

    How widespread are the symptoms of overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population-based prevalence study

    BJU Int

    (2001)
  • W.F. Stewart et al.

    Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States

    World J Urol

    (2003)
  • P. Abrams et al.

    Clinical manual of incontinence in women

    (2005)
  • C. Shaw et al.

    Barriers to help seeking in people with urinary symptoms

    Fam Pract

    (2001)
  • P. Reeves et al.

    The current and future burden and cost of overactive bladder in five European countries

    Euro Urol

    (2006)
  • M.T. Rosenberg et al.

    Overactive bladder: evaluation and management in primary care

    Cleve Clin J Med

    (2005)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text