Original articleEffectiveness of Clinical Decision Support in Controlling Inappropriate Imaging
Introduction
Health care expenses in the United States continue to spiral upward, now representing more than 17% of the gross domestic product [1]. Imaging is one of the most important contributors to health care costs, encompassing more than 14% of Medicare Part B expenditures [2, 3, 4]. Although identified as the most significant advance in medicine in the past several decades [5], imaging has become a target for cost containment. A major driver for increasing imaging cost is the inappropriate utilization of advanced imaging, including CT and MRI [4, 6, 7, 8]. Accordingly, health care providers are under increasing pressure to limit imaging to evidence-based applications.
Payers have initiated several approaches to control imaging utilization, including external authorization methods and clinical decision support systems [9]. Clinical decision support systems are point-of-order decision aids, usually through computer order entry systems, that provide real-time feedback to providers ordering imaging tests, including information on test appropriateness for specific indications. Such systems may be purely educational, or they may be restrictive in not allowing imaging test ordering to proceed when accepted indications are absent. Although data on the efficacy of imaging clinical decision support systems are limited [10], adoption is increasing and has spread to include state-level initiatives in Washington [11] and Minnesota [12]. Imaging clinical decision support systems can range from simple aids for small numbers of studies and indications to broad systems encompassing the thousands of possible pairs of indications and imaging procedures. To date, there are no published studies demonstrating decreased imaging utilization after implementation of imaging clinical decision support, though a decrease in the rate of growth of utilization of imaging has been reported. We hypothesized that imaging clinical decision support could decrease imaging utilization when targeted to select imaging studies and indications that included high volumes and high cost [13, 14].
The objective of this investigation was to identify changes in imaging utilization associated with the initiation of an imaging management program based on clinical decision support for selected CT and MRI studies at a single integrated health care delivery system.
Section snippets
Methods
The overall study design was a retrospective cohort evaluation of the effect of the staged implementation of a clinical decision support system on imaging utilization, with historical and concurrent controls. The study was granted a waiver from the institutional review board.
Results
We found clinically and statistically significant decreases in utilization rates for the targeted procedures after the intervention. Table 1 details the raw counts of imaging procedures, as well as the counts of patients with the corresponding diagnoses and the rate of imaging among affected individuals before and after the intervention. The rates of imaging after the intervention were 23.4% lower for low back pain lumbar MRI (RR, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.67; P < .001), 23.2%
Discussion
Clinical decision support is potentially an ideal method for improving the evidence-based use of imaging. Clinical decision support tools have the desired properties of being educational, transparent, efficient, practical, and consistent [4]. However, data on the effectiveness of clinical decision support is limited. Prior investigation has focused on the use of a global system encompassing virtually all CT and MRI studies and indications and has demonstrated only a relative attenuation in the
Acknowledgment
We gratefully acknowledge the collaboration of Premera Blue Cross in providing access to our institutional claims data.
References (20)
- et al.
Strategies for managing imaging utilization
J Am Coll Radiol
(2009) - et al.
Analysis of appropriateness of outpatient CT and MRI referred from primary care clinics at an academic medical center: how critical is the need for improved decision support
J Am Coll Radiol
(2010) - et al.
Radiology order entry with decision support: initial clinical experience
J Am Coll Radiol
(2006) - et al.
Health spending projections through 2019: the recession's impact continues
Health Aff (Millwood)
(2010) Office of Inspector General report: growth in advanced imaging paid under the Medicare physician fee schedule
(2007)Report to Congress: variation and innovation in medicine
(2003)- et al.
Physicians' views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations
Health Aff (Millwood)
(2001) Foreword
- et al.
US healthcare spending in an international context
Health Aff (Millwood)
(2004) - et al.
Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis
Radiology
(2009)