Original contributionA Comparison of Frequent and Infrequent Visitors to an Urban Emergency Department
Introduction
Frequent visitors to Emergency Departments (EDs) are responsible for a large proportion of ED visits. Studies that define a frequent visitor as a patient who makes a minimum of four visits in the prior year have found that 4% of ED patients are responsible for 20–30% of annual visits (1, 2, 3, 4). A study that defined a frequent ED patient as one with at least three ED visits in the prior year found that frequent visitors accounted for 73% of visits (5). Frequent visitors contribute to long waiting times for more seriously ill patients and higher economic costs for hospitals (2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Although frequent visitors have their share of serious medical problems, the medical complaints of frequent visitors can often be managed effectively in a primary care setting (11, 12). Frequent ED visitors are also at risk of receiving inadequate care due to insufficient attention to prevention, and by having their medical problem diagnosed differently by multiple doctors (10, 13, 14). To improve their quality of care, it is essential to obtain a detailed understanding of the reasons why frequent visitors continually seek medical care at the ED and then to formulate a strategy that will address their specific needs.
Several studies have compared frequent visitors to control groups of non-frequent visitors to the ED (1, 4, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21). Frequent visitors experienced more accidents and health problems and self-reported a low health status (16). They are more likely to visit the ED for alcohol abuse and for exacerbations of chronic conditions or existing illnesses (1, 4, 15). They experience more psychosocial problems and have poorer mental health (15, 18). A record of frequent ED use is indicative of future frequent ED visits and increased use of public services such as psychiatric and social services (17, 19). Frequent visitors are more likely to have a usual source of medical care other than the ED, be African-American, and be uninsured or have Medicaid or Medicare coverage (4, 12, 15, 18, 20). Other studies of frequent visitors, however, described only frequent visitors with no control group of infrequent visitors to allow one to distinguish unique characteristics of frequent visitors (2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30).
The goal of this study was to describe differences between frequent visitors and infrequent visitors at an inner-city, adult ED as an initial step in developing interventions to reduce inappropriate frequent utilization of ED services.
Section snippets
Study Design and Setting
This was a cross-sectional comparison of frequent visitors and infrequent visitors at the adult, inner-city ED of the University of Chicago Medical Center (UCMC-ED). We defined frequent visitors as patients having at least three visits to the UCMC-ED in the prior 12 months. At the time of the study, 49,000 patients were seen in the ED per year; 7% were frequent visitors, and they accounted for 30% of the total ED visits.
ED patients were asked to participate in this study on a volunteer basis by
Comparison of Demographic Characteristics of Frequent Visitors and Infrequent Visitors
Over a 3-month period, 168 patients between the ages of 18 and 87 years were enrolled in the study, including 69 frequent visitors and 99 infrequent visitors. An estimated 250 patients were approached during the study, 120 frequent visitors and 130 infrequent visitors. Thirty-one of the infrequent visitors and 51 of the frequent visitors refused to participate, yielding participation rates of 58% for frequent visitors and 76% for infrequent visitors.
Demographic information about the
Discussion
In this study we confirmed some findings from prior frequent visitor studies, but a number of our findings are at odds with previous studies or are new findings. Frequent visitors to the University of Chicago Medical Center Emergency Department are more likely to be unemployed, retired or disabled, African-American, and have Medicaid; these findings are consistent with other studies. However, frequent visitors to UCMC-ED are only half as likely to be uninsured compared to infrequent visitors, a
Conclusions
With the aforementioned limitations in mind, this study confirmed several characteristics of frequent ED visitors noted by previous investigators. Frequent visitors are more likely to be unemployed, retired or disabled, African-American, and to have Medicaid. They are more likely to be depressed and to report higher levels of stress. They are better connected than infrequent visitors to the medical system, including primary care physicians. The new findings from this study are the very high
References (35)
- et al.
Frequent use of the hospital emergency department is indicative of high use of other health care services
Ann Emerg Med
(2001) - et al.
An analysis of frequent users of emergency care at an urban university hospital
Ann Emerg Med
(1998) Heavy users of emergency services: social construction of a policy problem
Soc Sci Med
(1995)- et al.
Characteristics of frequent users of emergency departments
Ann Emerg Med
(2006) - et al.
Heavy users of an emergency department: psychosocial and medical characteristics, other health care contacts and the effect of a hospital social worker intervention
Soc Sci Med
(1985) - et al.
Factors related to emergency department use: results from the Ontario health survey 1990
Ann Emerg Med
(1994) - et al.
Frequent attenders to an emergency department: a study of primary health care use, medical profile, and psychosocial characteristics
Ann Emerg Med
(2003) - et al.
A descriptive study of heavy emergency department users at an academic emergency department reveals heavy ED users have better access to care than average users
J Emerg Nurs
(2005) - et al.
Psychosocial factors influencing non-urgent use of the emergency room: a review of the literature recommendations for research and improved services delivery
Soc Sci Med
(1992) - et al.
Use of ED as a regular source of care: associated factors beyond lack of health insurance
Ann Emerg Med
(1997)
The chronic emergency department patient
Ann Emerg Med
Frequent ED users: patterns of use over time
Am J Emerg Med
Epidemiologic analysis of an urban, public emergency department's frequent users
Acad Emerg Med
‘Inappropriate’ attenders at accident and emergency department I: definition, incidence, and reasons for attendance
Fam Pract
High users of VA emergency room facilities: are outpatients abusing the system or is the system abusing them?
Inquiry
High consumers of health care in emergency units: how to improve their quality of care
Qual Assur Health Care
Regular source of ambulatory care and medical care utilization by patients presenting to a public hospital emergency department
JAMA
Cited by (107)
Case management in primary care for frequent users of health care services: A realist synthesis
2020, Annals of Family MedicineFactors related to the frequent use of emergency department services in Korea
2023, BMC Emergency MedicineCluster Analysis of the Highest Users of Medical, Behavioral Health, and Social Services in San Francisco
2023, Journal of General Internal MedicineConceptualizing the effective mechanisms of a social needs case management program shown to reduce hospital use: a qualitative study
2022, BMC Health Services Research
This study was supported in part by a Healthy Community Access Program grant from the Bureau of Primary Health Care of the Health Resources and Services Administration.