Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 83, Issue 2, February 2012, Pages 202-207
Resuscitation

Clinical paper
Therapeutic hypothermia is associated with improved neurologic outcome and survival in cardiac arrest survivors of non-shockable rhythms

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.08.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Therapeutic hypothermia improves neurologic outcomes in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. However, its role in patients with cardiac arrest due to non-shockable rhythms (pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystole) is unclear. We hypothesized that therapeutic hypothermia favorably impacts neurologic outcome and survival in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest due to non-shockable rhythms.

Methods

Retrospectively collected data on consecutive adult patients admitted to Hartford Hospital from 1/1/2004 to 11/1/2010 who survived a cardiac arrest due to PEA or asystole were analyzed. Patients who underwent therapeutic hypothermia (1/1/2007–11/1/2010) formed the hypothermia group while patients admitted prior to the institution of therapeutic hypothermia (1/1/2004–1/1/2007) at Hartford Hospital formed the control group. The primary end-point was measured using the Pittsburgh cerebral performance category (CPC) scale and patients were assessed for a good (CPC 1 and 2) or poor (CPC 3–5) neurological outcome prior to discharge from hospital. A secondary end-point was measured as survival at discharge from hospital.

Results

Of 100 post-cardiac arrest patients included in the study, 15/52 (29%) patients in the hypothermia group had a good neurologic outcome as compared to 5/43 (10%) patients in the control group (P = 0.021). On multivariate analysis, the odds ratio for good neurologic outcome and survival at discharge from the hospital with therapeutic hypothermia as compared to control were 4.35 (95% CI 1.10–17.24, P = 0.04) and 5.65 (CI 1.66–19.23, P = 0.006) respectively.

Conclusion

Therapeutic hypothermia is associated with favorable neurologic outcome and survival in patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest due to non-shockable rhythms.

Introduction

An estimated 200,000 cardiac arrests occur out-of-hospital on an annual basis in the United States,1, 2 with limited survival rates of 0–11% depending on the presenting rhythm.3, 4 The true incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrest remains less apparent, but is estimated to be 1–5 events per 1000 hospital admissions.5

Following a cardiac arrest, the brain tolerates anoxia up to 2–4 min6 and thereafter irreversible neuronal damage commences in the absence of re-establishment of circulation. Re-oxygenation with successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), although essential in restoring the energy charge, provokes a deleterious chemical cascade by generating free radicals and other inflammatory mediators which leads to devastating neurologic consequences and death in the form of post-resuscitation syndrome.7 However, these harmful effects of reperfusion injury may be mitigated with the use of hypothermia as demonstrated in case reports and dog models since the 1950s.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

More recently, therapeutic hypothermia has been reported to improve neurologic outcomes and survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who have been successfully resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation (VF).16, 17 However, this beneficial effect of hypothermia therapy on outcomes for other rhythms has not been well studied. Approximately 19–32% of patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest who survive to discharge have a poor neurological outcome.18, 19 Moreover, the survival to hospital discharge rate in these patients varies from 0 to 42%, the most common range being between 15% and 20%.5

Advanced Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) and the 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation And Emergency Cardiovascular Care states: “unconscious adult patients with ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation) after out-of hospital cardiac arrest should be cooled to 32–34 °C (89.6–93.2 °F) for 12–24 h when the initial rhythm was VF (Class I). Similar therapy may be beneficial for patients with non-VF arrest out of hospital or for in-hospital arrest (Class IIb)”.20

The aim of the present study was to compare therapeutic hypothermia to control (normothermia) in comatose patients with cardiac arrest due to a non-shockable rhythm [pulseless electrical activity (PEA) or asystole].

Section snippets

Study population

Consecutive adult patients who were admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) at Hartford Hospital between January 1, 2004 and November 1, 2010 after successful resuscitation from an out-of-hospital or in-hospital cardiac arrest and who met the inclusion criteria formed the study cohort. The inclusion criteria were:

  • 1.

    PEA or asystole as the initial cardiac rhythm

  • 2.

    an age of 18 to 75 years

  • 3.

    Glasgow Coma Scale  8 after ROSC

  • 4.

    an estimated interval of 5–15 min from the patient's collapse to the first

Results

A total of 100 patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria of the study and formed the study cohort. Key follow-up data were available on all of the study patients. Of these, 52 patients (52%) who received therapeutic hypothermia formed the hypothermia group, while 48 patients (48%) who did not receive therapeutic hypothermia formed the control group. Table 1 compares the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients in the hypothermia and control groups. At baseline the

Discussion

Prognosis after resuscitation from cardiac arrest remains poor with post-ischemic brain injury as the leading cause of death.24 Both prospective randomized control trials and retrospective trials have shown that survival with good neurologic outcome is improved by inducing hypothermia in patients with return of spontaneous circulation after ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.16, 17, 25 However, this benefit has not been consistently demonstrated in patients with return of spontaneous

Limitations

This is a retrospective study conducted at a single large tertiary center and limits the extent to which the results can be generalized. Retrospective studies are limited by the inability to adjust for confounding factors and referral bias. Though resuscitation protocols may change over time, we do not believe that the resuscitation protocol at our institution has changed substantially during the study time period. Inspite of adjustment for the significant difference seen in number of

Conclusions

The use of therapeutic hypothermia is associated with improved neurologic outcome and survival at discharge in patients that have been successfully resuscitated after cardiac arrest due to a non-shockable rhythm (pulseless electrical activity and asystole) and should be offered to this group of cardiac arrest survivors.

Conflict of interest statement

Financial disclosure: Speaker for ZOLL Temperature Management.

Unlabeled/unapproved use disclosure: ICY Catheter© for induction of Therapeutic Hypothermia.

References (29)

  • R.S. Young et al.

    Neurological outcome in cold water drowning

    JAMA

    (1980)
  • T.S. Sekar et al.

    Survival after prolonged submersion in cold water without neurologic sequelae. Report of two cases

    Arch Intern Med

    (1980)
  • U. Althaus et al.

    Management of profound accidental hypothermia with cardiorespiratory arrest

    Ann Surg

    (1982)
  • W.G. Bigelow et al.

    Hypothermia; its possible role in cardiac surgery: an investigation of factors governing survival in dogs at low body temperatures

    Ann Surg

    (1950)
  • Cited by (0)

    A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.08.005.

    View full text