Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Health-related quality of life and healthcare resource utilization by COPD patients: A comparison of three instruments

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the SF-36 and two disease-specific instruments – St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRDQ) among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients using healthcare utilization data. The three instruments were administered twice by telephone interview to 40 COPD patients separated by a 3-month interval. Healthcare utilization data were obtained for the 3 months immediately prior to each administration. Reliabilities for sub-scales on the three instruments ranged from 0.70 to 0.90 for the SF-36, from 0.78 to 0.85 for the SGRQ, and from 0.64 to 0.91 for the CRDQ. In general, the study sample had poor physical health, and somewhat better mental health. None of the demographic variables were significantly associated with either health status or utilization. Among the three instruments, the SF-36 explained the most variance in healthcare utilization. The aggregate scores such as the summary scores of the SF-36 and the total score of the SGRQ did not perform as well as the individual sub-scales of the respective instruments in explaining the variation in utilization. The conclusion that the SF-36 provides the best association to healthcare utilization data from among the three instruments studied should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size and relatively brief duration of the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mahler DA, MacKowiak JI. Evaluation of the Short Form-36 itemquestion naire to measure health-related quality of life in patients with COPD. Chest 1995; 107: 1585–1589.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crockett AJ, Cranston JM, Moss JR, Alpers JH. The MOS SF-36 health survey questionnaire in severe chronic airflow limitation: Comparison with the Nottingham Health Profile. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 330–338.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Viramontes JL, Brien B. Relationship between symptoms and health-related quality of life in chronic lung disease. J Gen Intern Med 1994; 9(1): 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schlenk EA, Erlen JA, Dunbar-Jacob J, et al. Health-related quality of life in chronic disorders: A comparison across studies using the MOS SF-36. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Http: www.Coloradohealthnet.org/site/idx_copd.html. ‘COPD: Definitions, Facts, and Statistics’.

  6. McSweeny JA, Labuhn KT. Quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In: Spilker B (ed.) Qual Life and Pharmacoeconomics. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven Publishers, 1996; 961–976.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McSweeny J, Grant I, Heaton RK, Leonard D. Life quality of patients with COPD. Arch Int Med 1982; 142: 473–478.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Curtis JR, Deyo RA, Hudson LD. Health-related quality of life among patients with COPD. Thorax 1994; 49(2): 162–170.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson KL. The effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on quality of life. Res Nurs Health 1995; 18: 547–556.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mapel DW, Hurley JS, Frost FJ, Petersen HV, Picchi MA, Coultas DB. Healthcare utilization in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A case-control study in a health maintenance organization. Arch Int Med 2000; 160(7): 2653–2658.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. The MOS 36-item short formhealth survey (SF-36): Tests of data quality, scaling, assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32(1): 40–66.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: Results from a national survey. Med Care 1994; 32(6): 551–567.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek AE. Comparison of the methods of scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 Health Profile and Summary measures: Summary of results from the MOS. Med Care (Suppl) 1995; 33(4): AS264–AS279.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Summary Measures-A User's Manual. Boston MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guyatt G. Measurement of health-related quality of life in chronic airflow limitation. Monaldi Arch Chest Disease October 1993; 48(5): 554–557.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guyatt GH, Berman LB, Townsend M, Pugsley SO, Chambers LW. A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease. Thorax 1987; 42: 773–778.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wijkstra PJ, Ten Vergert EM, Alteena RV, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ). Thorax 1994; 49: 465–467.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guyatt GH, Townsend M, Berman LB, Pugsley S. Quality of life in patients with chronic airflow limitation. Br J Dis Chest 1987; 81: 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guyatt GH. Measuring health status in chronic airflow limitation. Eur Respir J 1988; 1: 560–564.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wijkstra PJ, Ten Vergert EM, Alteena RV, et al. Long term benefits of rehabilitation at home on quality of life and exercise tolerance in patients with COPD. Thorax 1995; 50: 824–828.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Martin LL. Validity and reliability of a quality of life instrument. Clinical Nursing Research May 1994; 3(2): 146–156.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, William A, Griggith LE. Determining a minimal clinically important change in a diseasespecific quality of life questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47(1): 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Redelmier DA, Guyatt GH, Goldstein RS. Assessing the minimal important difference in symptoms: A comparison of two techniques. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49(11): 1215–1219.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM, Littlejohns P. A self-complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limitation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145: 1321–1327.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Quirk FH, Baveystock CM, Wilson R, Jones PW. Influence of demographic and disease-related factors on the degree of distress associated with symptoms and restrictions on daily living due to asthma in six countries. Eur Respir J 1991; 4: 167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM. The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Respir Med 1991 85(Suppl B): 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM. Why quality of life measures should be used in the treatment of patients with respiratory illness. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 1994; 49(1): 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jones PW. Issues concerning health-related quality of life in COPD. Chest (Suppl) 1995; 107(5): 187S–193S.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimum clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10: 407–415.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Maille AR, Kaptein AA, De Haes JCJM, Everaerd WthAM. Assessing quality of life in chronic non-specific lung disease. A review of empirical studies published between 1980 and 1994. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Washington University School of Medicine/BJC Healthcare, St. Louis, MO, USA

    R. Desikan

  2. School of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    H.L. Mason

  3. School of Pharmacy, Midwestern University, Glendale Campus, Glendale, AZ, USA

    M.T. Rupp

  4. Arnett Managed Health Plans, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    M. Skehan

Authors
  1. R. Desikan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H.L. Mason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M.T. Rupp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Skehan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Desikan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desikan, R., Mason, H., Rupp, M. et al. Health-related quality of life and healthcare resource utilization by COPD patients: A comparison of three instruments. Qual Life Res 11, 739–751 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020836719321

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020836719321

Search

Navigation