Skip to main content
Log in

Awareness and Acceptance of Current Food Safety Recommendations During Pregnancy

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: To better understand pregnant women's food safety attitudes and beliefs that affect food selection, preparation and handling behaviors, sources of food safety information, motivators and barriers to adopting current recommendations, and preferences for receiving food safety materials. Methods: Eleven focus groups were conducted with 69 women (57 pregnant and 12 less than 6 months postpartum). The Health Belief Model guided development of the moderator's guide. In the presence of each focus group, participants completed a food safety attitude/behavior questionnaire. Sessions were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed for common themes across and within groups. Results: Most participants indicated moderate concern about food safety and had made some food handling or consumption changes since becoming pregnant; however, many were not following 7 of the 12 specific recommendations discussed. Further, there was resistance to change habits, especially for less well-known recommendations. The women assumed their food is safe, and wanted strong evidence regarding why they should change current practices. Common barriers included lack of prior awareness of most recommendations, no prior illness from implicated foods and the convenience, perceived health benefits of, and personal preference for many risky foods discussed. Participants wanted food safety information that was quick and easy to read, sufficiently thorough, and specifically targeted to pregnant women. Conclusions: The women studied had not internalized the connection between risky food consumption during pregnancy and risk to the unborn child, but expressed interest in valid information that might cause them to change their behaviors. The information gained will be useful in developing food safety educational materials for pregnant women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, Tauxe RV. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5:607–25.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altekruse SF, Cohen ML, Swerdlow DL. Emerging foodborne diseases. Emerg Infect Dis 1997;3:285–93.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gerba CP, Rose JB, Haas CN. Sensitive populations: Who is at the greatest risk? Int J Food Microbiol 1996;30:113–23.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Szekeres-Bartho J. Endocrine regulation of the immune system during pregnancy. In: Chaouat G, editor. Immunology of pregnancy. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1993:151–72.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith JL. Foodborne infections during pregnancy. J Food Protect 1999;62:818–29.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Silver HM. Listeriosis during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Survey 1998;53:737–40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lorber B. Listeriosis. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mylonakis E, Paliou M, Hohmann EL, Calderwood SB, Wing EJ. Listeriosis during pregnancy: A case series and review of 222 cases. Medicine 2002;81:260–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Listeriosis outbreak associated with Mexican-style cheese-California. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1985;34(24):357–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Food and Drug Administration/Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. A health alert for Hispanic pregnant women: For your baby's sake, avoid soft cheeses (such as Mexican-style, Feta, Brie, Camembert, and Roquefort). Updated: 1992. [cited 2003, March 21]. Available from: URL: http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/listeren.html.

  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of listeriosis associated with homemade Mexican-style cheese-North Carolina, October-January 2001. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001;50:560–2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multistate outbreak of listeriosis-United States, 1998. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998;47:1085–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multistate outbreak of listeriosis-United States, 2000. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2000;49:1129–30.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public health dispatch: outbreak of listeriosis-Northeastern United States, 2002. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;51:950–1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith JL. Long-term consequences of foodborne toxoplasmosis: Effects on the unborn, the immunocompromised, the elderly, and the immunocompetent. J Food Protect 1997;60:1595–611.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roll C, Schmid EN, Menken U, Hanssler L. Fatal Salmonella enteritidissepsis acquired prenatally in a premature infant. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:692–3.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Food and Drug Administration/U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Keep your baby safe: Eat hard cheeses instead of soft cheeses during pregnancy. Updated: July 2000. [cited 2003, Oct 13]. Available from: URL: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/listeren.html.

  18. U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service. Listeriosis and pregnancy: What is your risk? Safe food handling for a healthy pregnancy. Updated: September 2001. [cited 2003, Oct 23]. Available from: URL: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OA/pubs.lm tearsheet.htm.

  19. Kaiser L, Allen L. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Nutrition and lifestyle for a healthy pregnancy outcome. J Am Dietet Assoc 2002;102:405–12.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kendall P, Medeiros LC, Hillers V, Chen G, DiMascola S. Food handling behaviors of special importance for pregnant women, infants and young children, the elderly and immunecompromised people. J Am Dietet Assoc 2003;103:1647–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Research Triangle Institute. PR/HACCP Rule evaluation report, listeriosis food safety messages and delivery mechanisms for pregnant women. Final Report, February 23, 2001. [cited 2003, Nov 13]. Available from: URL: http:// www.fsis.udsda.gov/oa/research/lmfocus.htm.

  22. Rosenstock IM. The health belief model: Explaining health behavior through expectancies. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, editors. Health behavior and health education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990:39–62.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson AS. Pregnancy as a time for dietary change? Proc Nutr Soc 2001;60:497–504.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Medeiros LC, Hillers V, Chen G, Bergman V, Kendall P, Schroeder M. Design and development of food safety knowledge and attitude scales for consumer food safety education. J Am Dietet Assoc 2004; 104: (in press).

  25. Krueger RA. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Krueger RA. Focus group kit 6, Analyzing & reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN. Focus groups theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zeller RA. Combining qualitative and quantitative techniques to develop culturally sensitive measures. In: Ostrow DG, Kessler RC, editors. Methodological issues in AIDS mental health research. New York: Plenum Press, 1993:95–116.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Murkoff H, Eisenberg A, Hathaway S. What to expect when you're expecting. New York: Workman Publishing, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Taormina PJ, Beuchat LR, Slutsker L. Infections associated with eating seed sprouts: An international concern. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5:626–34.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mohle-Boetani JC, Farrar JA, WernerSB, MinassianD, Bryant R, Abbott S, Slutsker L, Vugia DJ. Escherichia coliO157 and Salmonellainfections associated with sprouts in California, 1996-1998. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:239–47.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gettings MA, Kiernan NE. Practices and perceptions of food safety among seniors who prepare meals at home. J Nutr Educ 2001;33:148–54.

    Google Scholar 

  33. USDA/FSIS (U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service). Thermometers are key to safety. 2000. [cited 2003, Oct 3]. Available from: URL: http:// www.fsis.usda.gov/OA/thermy/Research.pdf

  34. Hague MA, Warren KE, Hunt MC, Kropf DH, Kastner CL, Stroda SL, Johnson DE. Endpoint temperature, internal cooked color, and expressible juice color relationships in ground beef patties. J Food Sci 1994;59:465–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Athearn, P.N., Kendall, P.A., Hillers, V.‘. et al. Awareness and Acceptance of Current Food Safety Recommendations During Pregnancy. Matern Child Health J 8, 149–162 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MACI.0000037648.86387.1d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MACI.0000037648.86387.1d

Navigation