Skip to main content
Log in

Principles of generalist-specialist relationships

  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Katon W, VonKorff M, Lin E, et al. Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines: impact on depression in primary care. JAMA. 1995;273:1026–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Drummond D, Thom B, Brown C, Edwards G, Mullan M. Specialist versus general practitioner treatment of problem drinkers. Lancet. 1990;336:915–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McPhee S, Lo B, Saika G, Meltzer R. How good is communication between primary care physicians and subspecialty consultants? Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:1265–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alper PR. Specialists are getting a bum rap. Med Econ. 1996;73:197–202.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenfield S. Dividing up the turf: generalists versus specialists. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:245–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gabriel SE. Primary care: specialists or generalists. Mayo Clin Proc. 1996;71:415–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Zubkoff M, et al. Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1992;267:1624–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eisenberg JM. Doctor’s Decisions and the Cost of Medical Care. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Administration Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wofford JL, Wilson MC, Moran WP. The promotion of generalism in medicine: Renaissance or recycling? J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:697–701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson EG. When does a generalist need a specialist? J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:247–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fihn SD. Physician specialty, systems of health care, and patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;274:1473–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Percival T. Medical Ethics. Manchester, England: J. Johnson; 1803.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Code of medical ethics. In: Proceedings of the National Medical Convention. 1847;83–106.

  14. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual. 3rd ed. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:947–60.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Manian FA, Janssen DA. Curbside consultations: a closer look at a common practice. JAMA. 1996;275:145–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cummins RO, Smith RW, Inui TS. Communication failure in primary care: failure of consultants to provide follow-up information. JAMA. 1980;243:1650–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee T, Pappius EM, Goldman L. Impact of inter-physician communication on the effectiveness of medical consultations. Am J Med. 1983;74:106–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldman L, Lee T, Rudd P. Ten commandments for effective consultations. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143:1753–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Curry RW, Crandall LA, Coggins WJ. The referral process: a study of one method for improving communication between rural practitioners and consultants. J Fam Pract. 1980;10:287–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lawrence R, Dorsey JL. The generalist-specialist relationship and the art consultation. In: Noble J, ed. Primary Care and the Practice of Medicine. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown & Company; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Williams TF, White KL, Fleming WL, Greenberg BA. The referral process in medical care and the university clinic’s role. J Med Educ. 1961;36:899–907.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. Reimbursing physicians and hospitals. JAMA. 1994;272:971–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kassirer JP. What role for nurse practitioners in primary care? N Engl J Med. 1994;330:204–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kassirer JP. Access to specialty care. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1151–3. Editorial.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nash DB, Nash IS. Building the best team. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:72–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Terry K. Look who’s guarding the gate to specialty care. Med Econ. Aug 22, 1994:124–36.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ostrov M. Improving the primary care evaluation of infertility. HMO Pract. 1997;11:141–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kertesz L. Organizing specialists: more than 600 physicians have signed up for Oxford “teams” in N.Y.C. area. Mod Health. 1997;27:33.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reynolds PP. Reaffirming professionalism through the education community. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:609–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Baker R, Caplan A, Emanuel LL, Latham SR. Crisis, ethics and the American Medical Association: 1847 and 1997. JAMA. 1997;278:163–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pearson, S.D. Principles of generalist-specialist relationships. J GEN INTERN MED 14 (Suppl 1), S13–S20 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00259.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00259.x

Keywords

Navigation