Abstract
CONTEXT: Domestic violence has an estimated 30% lifetime prevalence among women, yet physicians detect as few as 1 in 20 victims of abuse.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with physicians’ low screening rates for domestic violence and perceived barriers to screening.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional postal survey.
PARTICIPANTS: A national systematic sample of 2,400 physicians in 4 specialties likely to initially encounter abused women. The overall response rate was 53%.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported percentage of female patients screened for domestic violence; logistic models identified factors associated with screening less than 10%.
RESULTS: Respondent physicians screened a median of only 10% (interquartile range, 2 to 25) of female patients. Ten percent reported they never screen for domestic violence; only 6% screen all their patients. Higher screening rates were associated with obstetrics-gynecology specialty (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.78), female gender (OR, 0.51; CI, 0.35 to 0.73), estimated prevalence of domestic violence in the physician’s practice (per 10%, OR, 0.72; CI, 0.65 to 0.80), domestic violence training in the last 12 months (OR, 0.46; CI, 0.29 to 0.74) or previously (OR, 0.54; CI, 0.34 to 0.85), and confidence in one’s ability to recognize victims (per Likert-scale point, OR, 0.71; CI, 0.58 to 0.87). Lower screening rates were associated with emergency medicine specialty (OR, 1.72; CI, 1.13 to 2.63), agreement that patients would volunteer a history of abuse (per Likert-scale point, OR, 1.60; CI, 1.25 to 2.05), and forgetting to ask about domestic violence (OR, 1.69; CI, 1.42 to 2.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians screen few female patients for domestic violence. Further study should address whether domestic violence training can correct misperceptions and improve physician self-confidence in caring for victims and whether the use of specific intervention strategies can enhance screening rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Novello AC, Rosenberg M, Saltzman L, Shosky J. From the Surgeon General. U.S. Public Health Service. JAMA. 1992;267:3132.
Abbott J, Johnson R, Koziol-McLane J, Lowenstein SR. Domestic violence against women. Incidence and prevalence in an emergency department population. JAMA. 1995;273:1763–7.
Hamberger LK, Saunders DG, Hovey M. Prevalence of domestic violence in community practice and rate of physician inquiry. Fam Med. 1992;24:283–7.
Gin NE, Rucker L, Frayne S, Cygan R, Hubbell FA. Prevalence of domestic violence among patients in three ambulatory care internal medicine clinics. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:317–22.
McCauley J, Kern D, Kolodner J, et al. The “battering syndrome”: prevalence and clinical characteristics of domestic violence in primary care internal medicine practices. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:737–46.
Friedman LS, Samet JH, Roberts MS, Hudlin M, Hans P. Inquiry about victimization experiences. A survey of patient preferences and physician practices. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1186–90.
McCauley J, Yurk RA, Jenckes M, Ford DE. Inside “Pandora’s box.” Abused women’s experiences with clinicians and health services. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:549–55.
Council on Scientific Affairs. American Medical Association. Violence against women: relevance for medical practitioners. JAMA. 1992;267:3184–9.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG technical bulletin. Domestic violence. Number 209-August 1995. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;51:161–70.
Sasetti MR. Domestic violence. Prim Care. 1993;20:289–303.
Easteal PW, Easteal S. Attitudes and practices of doctors toward spouse assault victims: an Australian study. Violence Vict. 1992;7:217–28.
Ferris LE, Tudiver F. Family physicians’ approach to wife abuse: a study of Ontario, Canada, practices. Fam Med. 1992;24:276–82.
Rodriguez MA, Bauer HM, McLoughlin E, Grumbach K. Screening and intervention for intimate partner abuse. Practices and attitude of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1999;282:468–74.
Department of Data Services. American Medical Association. Physicians’ Characteristics and Distribution in the U.S. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1994.
Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB. Handbook of Survey Research. Boston, Mass: Academic; 1983.
Sheikh K, Mattingly S. Investigating non-response in mail surveys. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981;35:293–6.
Buehler J, Dixon B, Toomey K. Analysis of data from the 1995 Georgia Women’s Health Survey discloses a 30% lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence among women in Georgia. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47:670–3.
Dearwater SR, Coben JH, Campbell JC, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner abuse in women treated at community hospital emergency departments. JAMA. 1998;280:433–8.
Saunders DG, Kindy P. Predictors of physicians’ responses to women abuse: the role of gender, background, and brief training. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:606–9.
Lurie N, Slater J, McGovern P, Ekstrum J, Quam L, Margolis K. Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter? N Engl J Med. 1993;329:478–82.
Krueter MW, Strecher VJ, Harris R, Kobrin SC, Skinner CS. Are patients of women physicians screened more aggressively? A prospective study of physician gender and screening. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:119–25.
Sugg NK, Inui T. Primary care physicians’ response to domestic violence. Opening Pandora’s box. JAMA. 1992;267:3157–60.
Alpert EJ. Violence in intimate relationships and the practicing internist: new “disease” or new agenda? Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:774–81.
Warshaw C. Domestic violence: challenges to medical practice. J Women’s Health. 1993;2:73–80.
Olson L, Anctil C, Fullerton L, Brillman J, Arbuckle J, Sklar D. Increasing emergency physician recognition of domestic violence. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27:741–6.
McLeer SV, Anwar R. A study of battered women presenting in an emergency department. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:65–6.
Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–36.
Montano DE, Phillips WR. Cancer screening by primary care physicians: comparison of rates obtained from physician self-report, patient survey, and chart audit. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:795–800.
McPhee SJ, Richard RJ, Solkowitz SN. Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:275–81.
Leaf DA, Neighbor WE, Schaad D, Scott CS. A comparison of self-report and chart audit in surveying resident physician assessment of cardiac risk factors. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:194–8.
Brown JB, Lent B, Brett PJ, Pederson LL. Development of the Women Abuse Screening Tool for use in family practice. Fam Med. 1996;28:422–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elliott, L., Nerney, M., Jones, T. et al. Barriers to screening for domestic violence. J GEN INTERN MED 17, 112–116 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10233.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10233.x