Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Barriers to screening for domestic violence

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CONTEXT: Domestic violence has an estimated 30% lifetime prevalence among women, yet physicians detect as few as 1 in 20 victims of abuse.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with physicians’ low screening rates for domestic violence and perceived barriers to screening.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional postal survey.

PARTICIPANTS: A national systematic sample of 2,400 physicians in 4 specialties likely to initially encounter abused women. The overall response rate was 53%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported percentage of female patients screened for domestic violence; logistic models identified factors associated with screening less than 10%.

RESULTS: Respondent physicians screened a median of only 10% (interquartile range, 2 to 25) of female patients. Ten percent reported they never screen for domestic violence; only 6% screen all their patients. Higher screening rates were associated with obstetrics-gynecology specialty (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.78), female gender (OR, 0.51; CI, 0.35 to 0.73), estimated prevalence of domestic violence in the physician’s practice (per 10%, OR, 0.72; CI, 0.65 to 0.80), domestic violence training in the last 12 months (OR, 0.46; CI, 0.29 to 0.74) or previously (OR, 0.54; CI, 0.34 to 0.85), and confidence in one’s ability to recognize victims (per Likert-scale point, OR, 0.71; CI, 0.58 to 0.87). Lower screening rates were associated with emergency medicine specialty (OR, 1.72; CI, 1.13 to 2.63), agreement that patients would volunteer a history of abuse (per Likert-scale point, OR, 1.60; CI, 1.25 to 2.05), and forgetting to ask about domestic violence (OR, 1.69; CI, 1.42 to 2.02).

CONCLUSIONS: Physicians screen few female patients for domestic violence. Further study should address whether domestic violence training can correct misperceptions and improve physician self-confidence in caring for victims and whether the use of specific intervention strategies can enhance screening rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Novello AC, Rosenberg M, Saltzman L, Shosky J. From the Surgeon General. U.S. Public Health Service. JAMA. 1992;267:3132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Abbott J, Johnson R, Koziol-McLane J, Lowenstein SR. Domestic violence against women. Incidence and prevalence in an emergency department population. JAMA. 1995;273:1763–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamberger LK, Saunders DG, Hovey M. Prevalence of domestic violence in community practice and rate of physician inquiry. Fam Med. 1992;24:283–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gin NE, Rucker L, Frayne S, Cygan R, Hubbell FA. Prevalence of domestic violence among patients in three ambulatory care internal medicine clinics. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:317–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McCauley J, Kern D, Kolodner J, et al. The “battering syndrome”: prevalence and clinical characteristics of domestic violence in primary care internal medicine practices. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:737–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman LS, Samet JH, Roberts MS, Hudlin M, Hans P. Inquiry about victimization experiences. A survey of patient preferences and physician practices. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1186–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McCauley J, Yurk RA, Jenckes M, Ford DE. Inside “Pandora’s box.” Abused women’s experiences with clinicians and health services. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:549–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Council on Scientific Affairs. American Medical Association. Violence against women: relevance for medical practitioners. JAMA. 1992;267:3184–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG technical bulletin. Domestic violence. Number 209-August 1995. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;51:161–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sasetti MR. Domestic violence. Prim Care. 1993;20:289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Easteal PW, Easteal S. Attitudes and practices of doctors toward spouse assault victims: an Australian study. Violence Vict. 1992;7:217–28.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferris LE, Tudiver F. Family physicians’ approach to wife abuse: a study of Ontario, Canada, practices. Fam Med. 1992;24:276–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodriguez MA, Bauer HM, McLoughlin E, Grumbach K. Screening and intervention for intimate partner abuse. Practices and attitude of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1999;282:468–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Department of Data Services. American Medical Association. Physicians’ Characteristics and Distribution in the U.S. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB. Handbook of Survey Research. Boston, Mass: Academic; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sheikh K, Mattingly S. Investigating non-response in mail surveys. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981;35:293–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Buehler J, Dixon B, Toomey K. Analysis of data from the 1995 Georgia Women’s Health Survey discloses a 30% lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence among women in Georgia. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47:670–3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dearwater SR, Coben JH, Campbell JC, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner abuse in women treated at community hospital emergency departments. JAMA. 1998;280:433–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Saunders DG, Kindy P. Predictors of physicians’ responses to women abuse: the role of gender, background, and brief training. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:606–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lurie N, Slater J, McGovern P, Ekstrum J, Quam L, Margolis K. Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter? N Engl J Med. 1993;329:478–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Krueter MW, Strecher VJ, Harris R, Kobrin SC, Skinner CS. Are patients of women physicians screened more aggressively? A prospective study of physician gender and screening. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:119–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sugg NK, Inui T. Primary care physicians’ response to domestic violence. Opening Pandora’s box. JAMA. 1992;267:3157–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Alpert EJ. Violence in intimate relationships and the practicing internist: new “disease” or new agenda? Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:774–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Warshaw C. Domestic violence: challenges to medical practice. J Women’s Health. 1993;2:73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Olson L, Anctil C, Fullerton L, Brillman J, Arbuckle J, Sklar D. Increasing emergency physician recognition of domestic violence. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27:741–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McLeer SV, Anwar R. A study of battered women presenting in an emergency department. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:65–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Montano DE, Phillips WR. Cancer screening by primary care physicians: comparison of rates obtained from physician self-report, patient survey, and chart audit. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:795–800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McPhee SJ, Richard RJ, Solkowitz SN. Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:275–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Leaf DA, Neighbor WE, Schaad D, Scott CS. A comparison of self-report and chart audit in surveying resident physician assessment of cardiac risk factors. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:194–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Brown JB, Lent B, Brett PJ, Pederson LL. Development of the Women Abuse Screening Tool for use in family practice. Fam Med. 1996;28:422–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorrie Elliott MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elliott, L., Nerney, M., Jones, T. et al. Barriers to screening for domestic violence. J GEN INTERN MED 17, 112–116 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10233.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10233.x

Key words

Navigation