Abstract
BACKGROUND: Resident research has potential benefits and scholarly activity is an internal medicine residency training requirement. This study sought to learn about the resources needed and the barriers to performing scholarly work during residency from residents who had been successful.
METHODS: A questionnaire was delivered to 138 internal medicine residents presenting their work at the 2002 American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine annual session. Residents were asked to comment on why they had participated in a scholarly project, the skills and resources needed to complete the project, as well as the barriers. Comparisons were made between residents who presented a research abstract and those who exhibited a clinical vignette.
RESULTS: Seventy-three residents (53%) completed the questionnaire. Thirty-nine residents presented a clinical vignette and 34 displayed a research abstract. Residents participated in research for a variety of reasons, including intellectual curiosity (73%), career development (60%), and to fulfill a mandatory scholarly activity requirement at their residency program (32%). The most common barriers were insufficient time (79%), inadequate research skills (45%), and lack of a research curriculum (44%). Residents who had presented research abstracts devoted more time (median, 200 vs 50 hours; P<.05) to their project than those who exhibited clinical vignettes. Sixty-nine percent of residents thought research should be a residency requirement.
CONCLUSION: The majority of respondents reported that their scholarly project was a worthwhile experience despite considerable barriers. Teaching research skills more explicity with a focused curriculum and providing adequate protected time may enable residents to be successful.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Hayward RA, Taweel F. Data and the internal medicine house officer: alumni’s views of the educational value of a residency program’s research requirement. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:140–2.
Rogers LF. The “win-win” of research. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:877.
Residency program training requirements. Available from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education at: http://www.acgme.org. Accessed March 16, 2003.
Levine RB, Hebert RS, Wright SM. Resident research and scholarly activity in internal medicine residency training programs. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:155–9.
Alguire PC, Anderson WA, Albrecht RR, Poland GA. Resident research in internal medicine training programs. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:321–8.
Schultz HJ. Research during internal medicine residency training: meeting the challenge of the Residency Review Committee. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:340–2.
DeHaven MJ, Wilson GR, O’Connor-Kettlestrings P. Creating a research culture: what we can learn from residencies that are successful in research. Fam Med. 1998;30:501–7.
Morris BAP, Kerbel D, Nguyen LT. Family practice residents’ attitudes toward their academic projects. Fam Med. 1994;26:579–82.
Blake DJ, Lezotte DC, Yablon S, Rondinelli RD. Structured research training in residency training programs. The impact on the level of resident research activity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;73:245–50.
Collier VU, McCue JD, Markus A, Smith L. Stress in medical residency: status quo after a decade of reform? Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:384–90.
Wass CT, Long TR, Randle DW, Rose SH, Faust RJ, Decker PA. Recruitment of house staff into anesthesiology: a re-evaluation of factors responsible for house staff selecting anesthesiology as a career and individual training program. J Clin Anesth. 2003;15:289–94.
Gross CP, Donnelly GB, Reisman AB, Sepkowitz KA, Callahan MA. Resident expectations of morning report: a multi-institutional study. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1910–4.
Sharp LK, Wang R, Lipsky MS. Perception of competency to perform procedures and future practice intent: a national survey of family practice residents. Acad Med. 2003;78:926–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors would like to declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rivera, J.A., Levine, R.B. & Wright, S.M. Brief report: Completing a scholarly project during residency training. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 366–369 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04157.x
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04157.x