Skip to main content
Log in

Health care market trends and the evolution of hospitalist use and roles

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe local health care market dynamics that support increasing use of hospitalists’ services and changes in their roles.

DESIGN: Semistructured interviews in 12 randomly selected, nationally representative communities in the Community Tracking Study conducted in 2002–2003. Interviews were coded in qualitative data analysis software. We identified patterns and themes within and across study sites, and verified conclusions by triangulating responses from different respondent types, examining outliers, searching for corroborating or disconfirming evidence, and testing rival explanations.

SETTING: Medical groups, hospitals, and health plans in 12 representative communities.

PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seven purposively sampled executives at the 3–4 largest medical groups, hospitals, and health plans in each community: medical directors and medical staff presidents; chief executive and managing officers; executives responsible for contracting, physician networks, hospital patient safety, patient care services, planning, and marketing; and local medical and hospital association leaders.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We asked plan and hospital respondents about their competitive strategies, including their experience with cost pressures, hospital patient flow problems, and hospital patient safety efforts. We asked all respondents about changes in their local market over the past 2 years generally, and specifically: hospitals’ and physicians’ responses to market pressures; payment arrangements hospitals and physicians had with private health plans; and physicians’ relationships with plans and hospitals. We drew on data on hospitalist practice structures, employment relationships, and productivity/compensation from the Society for Hospital Medicine’s 2002 membership survey. Factors that fomented the creation of the hospital medicine movement persist, including cost pressures and primary care physicians’ decreasing inpatient volume. But emerging influences made hospitalists even more attractive, including worsening problems with patient flow in hospitals, rising malpractice costs, and the growing national focus on patient safety. Local market forces resulted in new hospitalist roles and program structures, regarding which organizations sponsored hospitalist programs, employed them, and the functions they served in hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings have important implications for patients, hospitalists, and their employers. Hospitalists may require changes in education and training, develop competing goals and priorities, and face new issues in their relationships with health plans, hospitals, and other physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wachter RM, Goldman L. The emerging role of “hospitalists” in the American healthcare system. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:514–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. The Society of Hospital Medicine. The Major Hospitalist Professional Organization, Has over 4000 Members and Estimates at Least 8000 Hospitalists Were Practicing in 2003. Available at: http://www.hospital-medicine.org/presentation/apps/indlist/intro.asp?area=mediacenter&flag=13. Accessed October 16, 2003.

  3. Levinson W, Linzer M. What is an academic general internist? Career options and training pathways. JAMA. 2002;288:2045–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wachter RM, Goldman L. The hospitalist movement 5 years later. JAMA. 2002;287:487–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindenauer PK, Chehabeddine R, Pedow P, et al. Quality of care for patients hospitalized with heart failure: assessing the impact of hospitalists. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1251–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rifkin WD, Conner D, Silver A, Eichorn A. Comparison of processes and outcomes of pneumonia care between hospitalists and community-based primary care physicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:1053–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith PC, Westfall JM, Nicholas RA. Primary care family physicians and 2 hospitalist models: comparison of outcomes, processes, and costs. J Fam Pract. 2002;51:1021–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoff TH, Whitcomb WF, Williams K, et al. Characteristics and work experiences of hospitalists in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:851–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kemper P, Blumenthal D, Corrigan JM, et al. The design of the community tracking study: a longitudinal study of health system change and its effects on people. Inquiry. 1996;33:195–206.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lesser CS, Ginsburg PB, Devers KJ. The end of an era: what became of the “managed care revolution in” 2001? Health Serv Res. 2003;38:337–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Devers KJ. How will we know “good” qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Serv Res. 1993;34(pt 2):1153–88.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pham HH, Devers KJ, May JH, Berenson R. Financial pressures spur physician entrepreneurialism. Health Aff (Millbank). 2004;23:70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Levit K, Smith C, Cowan C, et al. Health spending rebound continues in 2002. Health Aff (Millbank). 2004;23:147–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bazzoli GJ, Brewster LR, Liu G, Kuo S. Does hospital service capacity in the US need to be expanded? Health Aff (Millbank). 2003;22:40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Studdert DM, Thomas EJ, Burstin HR, Zbar BI, Orav EJ, Brennan TA. Negligent care and malpractice claiming behavior in Utah and Colorado. Med Care. 2000;38:250–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Berenson R, Kuo S, May JH. Medical Malpractice Liability Meets Markets: Stress in Unexpected Places, Issue Brief No. 69. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Factsheet: ICU Physician Staffing, The Leapfrog Group, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/Leapfrog-ICU_Physician_Staffing_Fact_Sheet.pdf. Accessed December 2, 2003.

  19. Devers KJ, Pham HH, Liu G. What is driving hospitals’ patient safety efforts? Health Aff (Millbank). 2004;23:103–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ragin CC. The distinctiveness of case-oriented research. Health Serv Res. 1998;34:1137–51.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Katz A, Hurley RE, Conwell LJ, et al. HMOs Alive and Well in Orange County, Community Report No. 9. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Short AC, Christianson JB, Draper DA, et al. Population Growth, Economic Downturn Stress Phoenix’s Healthcare Capacity, Community Report No. 10. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mays GP, Trude S, Casalino LP, et al. Premium Hikes and Malpractice Insurance Disrupt Miami Healthcare Market, Community Report No. 11. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Practice Profiles, Society of Hospital Medicine website. Available at: http://www.hospitalmedicine.org/presentation/apps/publications/practiceprofiles.pdf. Accessed November 4, 2003.

  25. Plauth WH, Pantilat SZ, Wachter RM, Fenton CL. Hospitalists’ perceptions of their residency training needs: results of a national survey. Am J Med. 2001;111:247–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Table CO-EST2002-01-04—Arizona County Population Estimates: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2002. Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau. Release Date: April 17, 2003. Available at: http://www.census.gov/popest/archives/1990s/MA-99-01.txt. Accessed February 25, 2004.

  27. American Medical Association. Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the U.S., Division of Survey and Data Resources. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2001 and prior editions.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Singer JA, Cantoni CJ. Keeping the Doctor Away: What Makes Arizona Unattractive to Physicians, Arizona Issue Analysis 165. Phoenix, AZ: The Goldwater Institute; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Casalino LP, Pham HH, Bazzoli G. From multispecialty groups to single specialty groups. Health Aff (Millbank). 2004;23:82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoangmai H. Pham MD, MPH.

Additional information

See editorial by Auerbach, p. 208–9.

This work was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pham, H.H., Devers, K.J., Kuo, S. et al. Health care market trends and the evolution of hospitalist use and roles. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 101–107 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40184.x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40184.x

Key words

Navigation