Skip to main content
Log in

Disability Prevention

New Paradigm for the Management of Occupational Back Pain

  • Practical Disease Management
  • Published:
Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Abstract

Occupational back pain is a widespread self-limited but recurring disease that generates major societal costs and impairs workplace productivity. However, this societal impact is mostly accounted for by a small fraction of patients with back pain who have prolonged absence from work, i.e. prolonged disability.

Evidence from research from the past 2 decades has progressively shown that most efforts to prevent or cure the disease have limited results, explaining the expanding number of disability cases from back pain. However, recent evidence has also shed light on the causes of disability that are not only due to the patients’s personal characteristics (physical and psychosocial), but also stem from the patients’s environment in the disability problem — the workplace, the compensation system and even the healthcare delivery system.

In addition, successful intervention studies have used an approach to disability prevention through patient reassurance and interventions linked to the workplace, instead of using a medical model of back pain treatment. It is evident that the present disease treatment paradigm should be replaced by a disability prevention paradigm for patients with subacute or chronic back pain to avoid unnecessary evolution towards prolonged disability.

We propose a disability prevention management model to encourage clinicians, employers, unions and insurers, as well as researchers in the field, to work within the perspective of the disability paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deyo RA, Tsui-Wu YJ. Descriptive epidemiology of low-back pain and its related medical care in the United States. Spine 1987; 12(3): 264–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dionne CE. Low back pain. In: Crombie IK, editor. Epidemiology of pain. Seattle: International Association for the Study of Pain Press, 1999

  3. Frank JW, Kerr MS, Brooker AS, et al. Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Pt I. What do we know about primary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention before disability begins. Spine 1996; 21(24): 2908–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clinical practice guideline: acute low back problems in adults. Rockville: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1994: Report No. 14

  5. Hadler NM. To be a patient or a claimant with a musculoskeletal illness. In: Hadler NM, editor. Clinical concepts in regional musculoskeletal illness. Orlando: Grune & Stratton, 1987: 7–21

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abenhaim L, Suissa S. Importance and economic burden of occupational back pain: a study of 2,500 cases representative of Quebec. J Occup Med 1987; 29(8): 670–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Elam KC, Cherkin DC, Deyo RA. How emergency physicians approach low back pain: choosing costly options. J Emerg Med 1995; 13(2): 143–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spitzer WO, LeBlanc FE, Dupuis M. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine 1987; 12 (7 Suppl.): S1–59

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nachemson A. Back pain: delimiting the problem in the next millennium. Int J Law Psychiatry 1999; 22(5-6): 473–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 1994; 331(2): 69–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson RP. The facet syndrome. Myth or reality? Clin Orthop 1992; (279): 110–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carragee EJ, Paragioudakis S, Khurana S. Lumbar high intensity zones and discography in subjects without low back complaints. Spine. In press

  13. Fordyce WE. Back pain in the workplace. Management of disability in non specific conditions. Seattle: International Association for the Study of Pain Press, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  14. Waddel G. The epidemiology of back pain. In: The epidemiology and costs of back pain. Annex to the Clinical Standards Advisory Groups’s report on back pain. London: HMSO, 1994: 1–64

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hager WD. Workers compensation back claim study. National council on compensation insurance; 2000 Nov 3–4, Boca Raton (FL)

  16. Commission sur la santé et la sécurité au travail (CSST). Statistiques sur les affections vertébrales 1995–1998. Quebec: Commission sur la santé et la sécurité au travail, 1999

  17. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands. Pain 1995; 62(2): 233–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baril R, Martin JC, Lapointe C, et al. Étude exploratoire des processus de réinsertion sociale et professionnelle des travailleurs en réadaptation. Montreal: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et sécurité du travail du Québec (IR-SST), 1994. Report No. R-082

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frank J, Sinclair S, Hogg-Johnson S, et al. Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope — if we can just get all the players onside. Can Med Assoc J 1998; 158(12): 1625–31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rossignol M, Suissa S, Abenhaim L. The evolution of compensated occupational spinal injuries. A three-year follow-up study. Spine 1992; 17(9): 1043–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Infanterivard C, Lortie M. Prognostic factors for return to work after a first compensated episode of back pain. Occup Environ Med 1996; 53(7): 488–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Goertz MN. Prognostic indicators for acute low-back pain. Spine 1990; 15(12): 1307–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Gobeille D, et al. The prognostic consequences in the making of the initial medical diagnosis of work-related back injuries. Spine 1995; 20(7): 791–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Selim AJ, Ren XS, Fincke G, et al. The importance of radiating leg pain in assessing health outcomes among patients with low back pain. Results from the Veterans Health Study. Spine 1998; 23(4): 470–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. van der Weide WE, Verbeek JH, Salle HJ, et al. Prognostic factors for chronic disability from acute low-back pain in occupational health care. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999; 25(1): 50–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Street JH, et al. Predicting poor outcomes for back pain seen in primary care using patientss’ own criteria. Spine 1996; 21(24): 2900–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain: description of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. 2nd ed. Seattle: International Association for the Study of Pain Press, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  28. Coderre TJ, Katz J, Vaccarino AL, et al. Contribution of central neuroplasticity to pathological pain: review of clinical and experimental evidence. Pain 1993; 52(3): 259–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AMJ, Boeren RGB, et al. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back apin and its relation to behavorial performance. Pain 1995; 62: 363–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Deyo RA. The role of the primary care physician in reducing work absenteeism and costs due to back pain. Occup Med 1988; 3(1): 17–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Malmivaara A, Hakkinen U, Aro T, et al. The treatment of acute low back pain — bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity? N Engl J Med 1995; 332(6): 351–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bigos SJ, Battie MC, Spengler DM, et al. A longitudinal, prospective study of industrial back injury reporting. Clin Orthop 1992; 279: 21–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Baril R, Berthelette D, Ross C, et al. Les composantes et les déterminants organisationnels des interventions de maintien du lien ds’emploi en entreprises. Montreal: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et sécurité du travail du Québec (IRSST), 2000. Report No. R-238

    Google Scholar 

  34. Work Ready Collaborative Group. Facilitation of return to work after a soft tissue injury: Synthesizing evidence and experience: Report of Work Ready Phase 1 to HealNet. Hamilton: McMaster University; 1999

    Google Scholar 

  35. Orme TJ, Covatta C, Chappuis JL, et al. Employer attitude as a predictor of treatment and disability costs. North American Spine Society 15th Annual Meeting; 2000 Oct 25–28, New Orleans

  36. Shrey DE. Disability management in industry: the new paradigm in injured worker rehabilitation. Disab Rehab 1996; 18(8): 408–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Battie MC, Cherkin DC, Dunn R, et al. Managing low back pain: attitudes and treatment preferences of physical therapists. Phys Ther 1994; 74(3): 219–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM, et al. Management of chronic nonspecific low back pain in primary care: a descriptive study. Spine 1997; 22(1): 76–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rainville J, Carlson N, Polatin P, et al. Exploration of physicianss’ recommandations for activities in chronic low back pain. Spine 2000; 25(17): 2210–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Johnson WG, Baldwin ML, Burton Jr JF. Why is the treatment of work-related injuries so costly? New evidence from California. Inquiry 1996; 33(1): 53–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wickizer TM. Where are workerscompensation systems going? In: Occupational low back pain: the search of effective conservative care. 2000 Nov 3–4, Seattle (WA)

  42. Butterfield PG, Spencer PS, Redmond N, et al. Low back pain: predictors of absenteeism, residual symptoms, functional impairment, and medical costs in Oregon workerss’ compensation recipients. Am J Ind Med 1998; 34(6): 559–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Waddel G, Main CJ, Morris EW, et al. Chronic low-back pain, psychologic distress, and illness behavior. Spine 1984; 9(2): 209–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Frank JW, Brooker AS, DeMaio SE, et al. Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Pt II. What do we know about secondary prevention?. A review of the scientific evidence on prevention after disability begins. Spine 1996; 21(24): 2918–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. van Tulder MW, Assendelft WJ, Koes BW, et al. Spinal radiographic findings and nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of observational studies. Spine 1997; 22(4): 427–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Deyo RA, Bigos SJ, Maravilla KR. Diagnostic imaging procedures for the lumbar spine. Ann Intern Med 1989; 111(11): 865–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Group CSA. Back pain: report of a CSAG committee on back pain. London: HMSO, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kendall NAS, Linton SJ, Main CJ. Guide to assessing psychological yellow flags in acute low back pain: risk factors or long-term disability and work loss. Wellington: Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  49. Roland M, van Tulder M. Should radiologists change the way they report plain radiography of the spine? Lancet 1998; 352(9123): 229–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Mitchell RI, Carmen GM. The functional restoration approach to the treatment of chronic pain in patients with soft tissue and back injuries. Spine 1994; 19(6): 633–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Sinclair SJ, Hogg-Johnson SH, Mondloch MV, et al. The effectiveness of an early active intervention program for workers with soft-tissue injuries. The Early Claimant Cohort Study. Spine 1997; 22(24): 2919–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Cutler RB, Fishbain DA, Rosomoff HL, et al. Does nonsurgical pain center treatment of chronic pain return patients to work?. A review and meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 1994; 19(6): 643–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Bendix AF, Bendix T, Labriola M, et al. Functional restoration for chronic low back pain. Two-year follow-up of two randomized clinical trials. Spine 1998; 23(6): 717–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Mayer H, et al. A prospective two-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury. An objective assessment procedure. JAMA 1987; 258(13): 1763–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Hazard RG, Fenwick JW, Kalisch SM, et al. Functional restoration with behavioral support. A one-year prospective study of patients with chronic low-back pain. Spine 1989; 14(2): 157–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Teasell RV, Harth M. Functional restoration — returning patients with chronic low back pain to work — revolution or fad. Spine 1996; 21(7): 844–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Durand M-J, Loisel P. Therapeutic return to work: rehabilitation in the work place. Work. In press

  58. Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Eek C, et al. The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Phys Ther 1992; 72(4): 279–93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O. Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial. Spine 1995; 20(4): 473–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Yassi A, Tate R, Cooper JE, et al. Early intervention for backinjured nurses at a large Canadian tertiary care hospital: an evaluation of the effectiveness and cost benefits of a two-year pilot project. Occup Med 1995; 45(4): 209–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, et al. A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine 1997; 22(24): 2911–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Loisel P, Durand P, Abenhaim L, et al. Management of occupational back pain: the Sherbrooke model. Results of a pilot and feasibility study. Occup Environ Med 1994; 51(9): 597–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Loisel P, Gosselin L, Durand P, et al. Implementation of a participatory ergonomics program in the rehabilitation of workers suffering from subacute back pain. Appl Ergon 2001; 32(1): 53–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Loisel P. The Sherbrooke model cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness. In: Back bain and disability: unraveling the puzzle. Proceedings of the conference of Physical Medecine Research Foundation and the Occupational & Industrial Orthopaedic Centre and Spine Center from the Hospital for Joint diseases, Mont Sinai NYU Health; 2000 Nov 30–Dec 2; New York

    Google Scholar 

  65. Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehab 1998; 8(2): 113–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Nachemson A. Work for all. For those with low back pain as well. Clin Orthop 1983; 179: 77–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors are members of the research team Prevention of Handicap (PREVICAP) in occupational rehabilitation, supported by a grant from the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Loisel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loisel, P., Durand, MJ., Berthelette, D. et al. Disability Prevention. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 9, 351–360 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200109070-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200109070-00001

Keywords

Navigation