Comparative study of intranasal midazolam and intravenous diazepam sedation for procedures and seizures

Indian J Pediatr. 2006 Nov;73(11):975-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02758299.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intranasal midazolam for seizures and various procedures.

Methods: Prospective randomized study. Total 125 children of all ages of either sex, for seizure episode (n-76) and various invasive and non-invasive procedures (n-49) received either intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/Kg) or intravenous diazepam (0.3 mg/Kg). RESULTS. Mean time from arrival at hospital to starting treatment was significantly shorter in midazolam group compared to diazepam group [2.34+/-0.90; minute vs 4.61+/-1.08 minute p< 0.001]. Mean time to control seizures after arrival in hospital was significantly shorter in midazolam group compared to diazepam group [5.25+/-0.86 minute vs 6.51+/-1.06 minute p.

Conclusion: Midazolam by the intranasal route provides safe and equally effective non-invasive method of sedation for procedures and seizures.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Intranasal
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Conscious Sedation
  • Diazepam / administration & dosage*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives / administration & dosage*
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Male
  • Midazolam / administration & dosage*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Seizures / drug therapy

Substances

  • Hypnotics and Sedatives
  • Diazepam
  • Midazolam