The difference between medical students interested in rural family medicine versus urban family or specialty medicine

Can J Rural Med. 2008 Spring;13(2):73-9.

Abstract

Objective: To determine how first-year medical students interested in rural family medicine in Canada differ from their peers.

Method: From 2002 to 2004, first-year students (n = 2189) from 16 classes in 8 Canadian medical schools ranked intended career choices and indicated influences on their choices using Likert scales. We used t tests and chi2 tests to determine demographic influences and factor analysis, and we used analysis of variance to examine associated attitudes.

Results: Of the 1978 surveys returned (90.3%), 1905 were used in the analysis. Rural family medicine was ranked first by 11.1%, varying from 4.7% to 20.2% among schools. Students interested in rural family medicine were more likely to have grown up rurally, graduated from a rural high school and have family in a rural location than others (p < 0.001). They were more likely to be older, in a relationship, to have volunteered in a developing nation and less likely to have university-educated parents than those interested in a specialty (p < 0.008). Attitudes of students choosing family medicine, rural or urban, include social orientation, preference for a varied scope of practice and less of a hospital orientation or interest in prestige, compared with students interested in specialties (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Medical schools may address the rural physician shortages by considering student demographic factors and attitudes at admission.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Canada
  • Career Choice*
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Family Practice*
  • Female
  • Health Workforce*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Professional Practice Location
  • Rural Health Services*
  • Specialization*
  • Students, Medical / psychology*
  • Urban Health Services*