Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Research ArticleResearch

One hundred coughs

Family practice case series

Graham J. Worrall
Canadian Family Physician February 2008, 54 (2) 236-237;
Graham J. Worrall
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gworrall@mun.ca

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To record the presentation, diagnosis, management, and outcome of acute coughs presenting in family practice.

DESIGN A case series of consecutive patients with acute cough as their main symptom.

SETTING Rural family practice clinic and walk-in centre.

PARTICIPANTS One hundred consecutive patients with cough, ages 1 to 90.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical diagnosis of the cause of the cough, management of cough, and whether patients returned for a second visit.

RESULTS Seventy-three patients had viral respiratory tract infections; 15 had asthma; 6 had influenza; 4 had pneumonia; and 2 had croup. Eighty-one patients needed no prescription medication; 13 were prescribed steroids or bronchodilators for asthma; and 6 were prescribed antibiotics. No prescriptions for cough suppressants or decongestants were written. Only 7 patients returned to the clinic; 2 were prescribed antibiotics, and the others had no change in treatment.

CONCLUSION Most patients with cough require reassurance rather than medications, as their cough is self-limiting. Of the minority that requires medication, twice as many will benefit from adjustment of asthma medication as from antibiotics.

Acute cough is perhaps the most common presentation of acute illness in primary care, especially during the colder part of the year. This has been found in general practice surveys done in Australia,1 Great Britain,2 and the United States.3 Although most acute coughs are due to community-acquired viral infections,4–6 studies of family doctors repeatedly show that an inappropriately high number of antibiotics are being prescribed for this self-limiting illness in Canada,7 Australia,8 and the United States.9 At the same time, rates of asthma-related hospitalization and death, especially among the young, are increasing in developed countries.10,11

Surveys in various countries have found several reasons why family doctors prescribe so many antibiotics: doctors are worried about missing pneumonia12; their patients are more severely ill or more vulnerable13; there is time pressure at work14; and they desire to please their patients.15,16 Surveys of patients, on the other hand, have found that many patients value explanation and advice rather than an antibiotic prescription.17,18

It is clear that many family doctors prescribe “against the evidence” when treating patients with acute cough; they appear to ignore systematic reviews19 and the evidence-based clinical guidelines, which recommend fewer antibiotics and cough syrups.20

These facts inspired me to develop a case series of consecutive patients who presented to me with acute cough, so that I could observe my diagnostic spectrum, my management, and the outcomes of the illnesses.

METHOD

Ethical approval for this study was given by the Human Investigations Committee of Memorial University of Newfoundland in St John’s.

During the fall and winter of 2005–2006, I collected data on 100 consecutive patients who presented to me with acute cough that had a duration of 14 days or less. The setting was a rural community health centre. This centre provides family practice appointments and walk-in services in a small emergency department, which is open 24 hours a day. Two other nearby physicians provide office hours service on weekdays, and there are 2 hospital emergency rooms about 1 hour’s drive away.

All patients were seen within 30 minutes of presentation. The age and sex of the patient was noted. A careful history was taken, and a focused examination of the respiratory system, ears, nose, and throat was done. The following symptoms were recorded: duration of cough, presence of fever and hemoptysis, productivity of cough, and presence of viral respiratory tract infection (VRTI) symptoms other than cough. The recorded signs were temperature levels and the presence of runny nose, pharyngitis, enlarged cervical lymph nodes, and added respiratory sounds.

Following history and examination, a clinical diagnosis was made. No laboratory or radiologic tests were done. All patients were given the appropriate advice and treatment. For example, if a patient had pneumonia, an antibiotic was prescribed and advice was given; if a patient had asthma, medications and advice were given for that condition; if a viral respiratory condition was diagnosed, standard advice was given. All patients were informed of their diagnoses and all were requested to return after 2 to 3 days, if they were not feeling better by then.

Two months after the initial visit, the patient’s chart was examined to see whether or not any subsequent visits to the health centre had occurred—to be seen by me or any of the other doctors—and whether or not the initial diagnosis or management had changed.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the mean duration of cough before presentation was 4.8 days (standard deviation 4.0 days). Duration of cough before presentation ranged from 1 to 14 days. The age group with the shortest mean cough duration (2.8 days) was children aged 0 to 4 years (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Cough by diagnosis, patient age, and duration of cough before presentation: Mean duration of cough before presentation was 4.8 days (standard deviation 4 days).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Mean duration of cough before presentation of all illnesses (ie, viral respiratory tract infection, asthma, influenza, pneumonia, and croup) by age group

The condition with the shortest cough duration before presentation was influenza, with a mean of 2.0 days (Table 1). The mean duration for VRTI, pneumonia, and croup were all in the range of 3 to 5 days, while asthma patients waited the longest before coming to the doctor (mean 5.3 days).

Table 1 also shows the diagnoses made for the 100 patients with cough. By far the most common diagnosis was VRTI (73%). The next most common cause of cough was asthma (15%). Fewer patients had influenza, pneumonia, and croup.

Most patients were managed by advice and reassurance (81%). The most commonly prescribed medications were steroids or bronchodilators for asthma (13%). Antibiotics were prescribed for 4 patients at presentation, and 2 more were given antibiotics on a second visit. No cough suppressants, mucolytics, or decongestants were prescribed.

Of the patients who presented with a cough, only 7 returned for a second visit; upon my request, 4 of these patients returned the next day:

  • a middle-aged asthmatic woman whose peak expiratory flow rate had fallen to less than 50% of normal (I asked her to stay under observation in a holding bed, but she declined);

  • an elderly man with pneumonia;

  • another elderly man with pneumonia and pulmonary fibrosis; and

  • a middle-aged woman using immunosuppressant drugs because of a lung transplant 4 years ago.

All 4 patients were doing well when they returned, and no management changes were made by me.

Of the other 3 patients who returned, 1 needed a sick note from me, and 2 were prescribed antibiotics by colleagues of mine (for the diagnoses of bronchitis and otitis media).

DISCUSSION

In this case series, the coughs that presented earliest were those due to influenza, where cough is a prominent symptom, and those among children aged 0 to 4 years, where parental anxiety is often high.

Although many experienced family doctors think acute bronchitis is just another term to describe an acute cough, it is the most common cause of acute cough in primary care and the fifth most common new problem dealt with by FPs in Australia1,8 and in the United States.21 This case series, however, shows that asthma is also a common cause of acute cough.

It is rare that FPs need to prescribe antibiotics for patients with acute cough; antibiotics were needed only 4 times at the first visit in this case series of 100 patients. Only a few of the remaining 96 patients came back because of continued symptoms and only 2 of them needed antibiotics. These results make it all the more surprising that FPs in many countries continue to prescribe antibiotics for most patients with acute cough. In Australia, antibiotics were prescribed for 86% of acute bronchitis patients8; in the United States, the percentage ranged from 60% to 80%.9 When the patient is a smoker, the chances of getting an antibiotic increases to 90%.22 Also, a recent survey of British GPs found that 89% of them would prescribe antibiotics if the cough produced purulent sputum.23 In contrast, a survey of Dutch GPs found that only 30% of them said they would prescribe antibiotics for acute bronchitis.24

There have been 6 reviews of the antibiotic trials for acute bronchitis. Three reviews found no benefit19,25,26 and the other 3 found there was a modest treatment effect of antibiotics over placebo27–29; the use of antibiotics decreased the duration of productive cough by about half a day, and reduced time lost from work by 0.3 days. The consensus seems to be that antibiotics possibly have a modest effect for some patients, but there is no way of clearly identifying those people who will benefit.

A recent evidence-based guideline on the management of cough by the American College of Chest Physicians20 found that over-the-counter antitussive medications, which are sold by the barrel during the cough season, “are generally ineffective but can be offered to adults for short-term symptomatic relief of coughing.”

Conclusion

Despite the well-known limitations of the case-series method, this study confirmed that when asthma and pneumonia have been excluded in otherwise healthy patients (of all ages) who present with acute cough, the least harmful management is advising patients of the benign nature of their illness and its favourable prognosis without treatment. This should be emphasized to family doctors and residents. Whether or not the FP should mention that there is no effective treatment for most acute coughs is another matter.

Notes

EDITOR’S KEY POINTS

  • This case series looking at 100 consecutive cases of cough in a rural Newfoundland community clinic follows on Worrall’s previous case series on earache (

    Can Fam Physician 2000;46:1081-4.

    ).

  • This paper illustrates that most patients with cough have viral respiratory tract infections and can be managed without prescription medication.

POINTS DE REPÈRE DU RÉDACTEUR

  • Cette série de 100 cas de toux consécutifs dans une clinique communautaire rurale de Terre-Neuve fait suite à une série antérieure du même auteur portant sur des maux d’oreille (

    Can Fam Physician 2000;48 :1081-4.

    ).

  • Cet article montre que la plupart des patients qui toussent ont une infection virale des voies respiratoires qu’on peut traiter sans médication.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • *Full text is available in English at www.cfp.ca.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

    1. Bridges-Webb C,
    2. Dunstone MW
    . The Australian general practice morbidity and prescribing survey, 1969 to 1974. Aspects of morbidity: respiratory infections. Med J Aust 1976;2(Suppl 1):18-20.
    1. McCormick A,
    2. Fleming D,
    3. Charlton J
    . Morbidity statistics from general practice: fourth national study 1991–92. London, Engl: The Stationery Office; 1995.
    1. Marsland DW,
    2. Wood M,
    3. Mayo F
    . Content of family practice. Part 1: rank order of diagnoses by frequency. Part II. Diagnoses by disease category and age/sex distribution. J Fam Pract 1976;3(1):37-68.
    1. Hope-Simpson RE
    . A respiratory virus study in Great Britain: review and evaluation. Prog Med Virol 1969;11:354-407.
    1. Jonsson JS,
    2. Sigurdsson JA,
    3. Kirstinsson KG,
    4. Guthnadóttir M,
    5. Magnusson S
    . Acute bronchitis in adults: How close do we come to its aetiology in general practice? Scand J Prim Health Care 1997;15(3):156-60.
    1. Verheij TJ,
    2. Kaptein AA,
    3. Mulder JD
    . Acute bronchitis: aetiology, symptoms and treatment. Fam Pract 1989;6(1):66-9.
    1. Worrall G,
    2. Young B,
    3. Knight V
    . Inappropriate use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in a rural emergency department. Can J Rural Med 2005;10(2):86-8.
    1. Meza RA,
    2. Bridges-Webb C,
    3. Sayer GP,
    4. Miles DA,
    5. Traynor V,
    6. Neary S
    . The management of acute bronchitis in general practice: results from the Australian Morbidity and Treatment Survey 1990–91. Aust Fam Physician 1994;23(8):1550-3.
    1. Mainous AG,
    2. Zoorob RJ,
    3. Hueston WJ
    . Current management of acute bronchitis in primary care. Arch Fam Med 1996;5(2):79-83.
  1. Canadian Lung Association. Lung facts: 1994 update. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Lung Association; 1994.
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Asthma: United States 1980–90. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1992;41:733-5.
    1. Coenen S,
    2. van Royen P,
    3. Vermeire E,
    4. Hermann I,
    5. Denekens J
    . Antibiotics for coughing in general practice: a qualitative decision study. Fam Pract 2000;17(5):382-5.
    1. Damoiseaux RA,
    2. de Melker RA,
    3. Ausems MJ,
    4. van Balen FA
    . Reasons for non-guideline-based antibiotic prescribing in the Netherlands. Fam Pract 1999;16(1):50-3.
    1. Macfarlane J,
    2. Holmes W,
    3. Macfarlane R,
    4. Britten N
    . Influence of patients’ expectations on antibiotic management of acute lower respiratory tract infection in general practice: questionnaire study. BMJ 1997;315(7117):1211-4.
    1. Butler CC,
    2. Rollnick S,
    3. Pill R
    . Understanding the culture of prescribing: qualitative study of patients’ and general practitioners’ perceptions of antibiotics for sore throats. BMJ 1998;317(7159):637-42.
    1. Mainous AG 3rd.,
    2. Zoorob RJ,
    3. Oler MJ,
    4. Haynes DM
    . Patient knowledge of upper respiratory infections: implications for antibiotic expectations and unnecessary utilization. J Fam Pract 1997;45(1):75-83.
    1. Britten N,
    2. Ukoumunne O
    . The influence of patients’ hopes of receiving a prescription on doctors’ perceptions and the decision to prescribe: a questionnaire survey. BMJ 1998;315(7121):1506-10.
    1. Hamm RM,
    2. Hicks RJ,
    3. Bemden RA
    . Antibiotics and respiratory infections: are patients more satisfied when expectations are met? J Fam Pract 1996;43(1):56-62.
    1. Fahey T,
    2. Stocks N,
    3. Thomas R
    . Quantitative systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing antibiotics with placebo for acute cough in adults. BMJ 1998;316(7135):906-10.
    1. Irwin RS,
    2. Baumann MH,
    3. Bosler DC,
    4. Boulet LP,
    5. Braman SS,
    6. Brightling CE,
    7. et al
    . Diagnosis and management of cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2006;129(Suppl 1):1S-23S.
    1. DeLozier JE,
    2. Gagnon RO
    . 1989 summary: national ambulatory medical care survey 1989 summary. Advance data from vital and health statistics; no 203. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1991.
    1. Linder JA,
    2. Sim I
    . Antibiotic treatment of acute bronchitis in smokers: a systematic review. J Gen Int Med 2002;17:230-4.
    1. Stocks NP,
    2. Fahey T
    . The treatment of acute bronchitis by general practitioners in the UK. Results of a cross-sectional survey. Aust Fam Physician 2002;31(7):676-9.
    1. Kuyvenhoven MM,
    2. Verheij TJ,
    3. de Melker RA,
    4. van der Velden J
    . Antimicrobial agents in lower respiratory tract infections in Dutch general practice. Brit J Gen Pract 2000;50:133-4.
    1. Mackay DN
    . Treatment of acute bronchitis in adults without underlying lung disease. J Gen Intern Med 1996;11:557-62.
    1. Chandran R
    . Should we prescribe antibiotics for acute bronchitis? Am Fam Phys 2001;64:135-8.
    1. Bent S,
    2. Saint S,
    3. Itinghoff E,
    4. Grady B
    . Antibiotics in acute bronchitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Med 1999;107:62-7.
    1. Orr PH,
    2. Scherer K,
    3. MacDonald A,
    4. Moffatt ME
    . Randomized placebo-controlled trials of antibiotics for acute bronchitis: a critical review of the literature. J Fam Pract 1993;36(5):507-12.
    1. Smucny J,
    2. Fahey T,
    3. Becker L,
    4. Glazier R
    . Antibiotics for acute bronchitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(4):CD000245.

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire