Clinical question
What is the efficacy of commonly used treatments for nongenital warts?
Bottom line
High-quality evidence shows warts have resolved with cryotherapy or salicylic acid (SA) more often than with no treatment at 13 weeks. Cryotherapy causes more pain and blistering but gives greater patient satisfaction. Evidence for duct tape is limited and inconsistent.
Evidence
In a high-quality primary care RCT1 of 240 children and adults, new warts were treated with cryotherapy (2 to 10 seconds via cotton applicator 3 times every 2 weeks), daily 40% SA, or no treatment. Cure was assessed at 13 weeks.
-For all warts, cryotherapy cured 39%, SA 24%, and no treatment 16% (vs no treatment, number needed to treat [NNT] = 13 for SA and NNT = 3 for cryotherapy).
-For plantar warts, cryotherapy cured 30%, SA 33%, and no treatment 23% (not statistically significant). No patient older than 12 years had spontaneous resolution.
-Comparing cryotherapy with SA, patient satisfaction was 69% versus 24% (NNT = 3); adverse effects included pain (81% vs 12%, number needed to harm of 2) and blistering (51% vs 9%, number needed to harm of 3).
In a high-quality primary and secondary care RCT,2 229 patients (> 12 years) with mostly recalcitrant plantar warts were randomized to cryotherapy (about 10 seconds via spray or probe every 2 to 3 weeks) or daily 50% SA.
-At 12 weeks, there were no differences between cryotherapy and SA in cure (both 14%), patient satisfaction (62% vs 41%, NNT = 5), and blistering (2% vs 0%).
A systematic review of RCTs,3 limited by small heterogeneous studies, incomplete reporting, and high risk of bias, found cryotherapy not significantly better than placebo (3 RCTs, N = 227) but equivalent to SA (4 RCTs, N = 707), which is superior to placebo (6 RCTs, N = 486; NNT = 6).
Context
Implementation
Salicylic acid is cheap and over-the-counter concentrations vary from 17% to 40%. Cryotherapy is less convenient, more painful, and more costly.11 For cryotherapy, frequent treatment (eg, 1- to 2-week intervals) might result in earlier cure12 and less recurrence,13 but more blistering.12 Application method does not significantly affect outcomes.14 The benefit of over-the-counter freezing products is not clear, as coolant temperatures vary (−20°C vs −100°C for liquid nitrogen).15
Notes
Tools for Practice articles in Canadian Family Physician (CFP) are adapted from articles published on the Alberta College of Family Physicians (ACFP) website, summarizing medical evidence with a focus on topical issues and practice-modifying information. The ACFP summaries and the series in CFP are coordinated by Dr G. Michael Allan, and the summaries are co-authored by at least 1 practising family physician and are peer reviewed. Feedback is welcome and can be sent to toolsforpractice{at}cfpc.ca. Archived articles are available on the ACFP website: www.acfp.ca.
Footnotes
Competing interests
None declared
The opinions expressed in Tools for Practice articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily mirror the perspective and policy of the Alberta College of Family Physicians.
- Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada
References
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.